Change in defense mechanisms and coping over the course of short-term dynamic psychotherapy for adjustment disorder

Short‐term dynamic psychotherapy (STDP) has rarely been investigated with regard to its underlying mechanisms of change, even if psychoanalytic theory informs us about several potential putative mechanisms of change in patients. Change in overall defensive functioning is one. In this study, we explo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical psychology Vol. 66; no. 12; pp. 1232 - 1241
Main Authors: Kramer, Ueli, Despland, Jean-Nicolas, Michel, Luc, Drapeau, Martin, de Roten, Yves
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-12-2010
Wiley
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Short‐term dynamic psychotherapy (STDP) has rarely been investigated with regard to its underlying mechanisms of change, even if psychoanalytic theory informs us about several potential putative mechanisms of change in patients. Change in overall defensive functioning is one. In this study, we explored the role of overall defensive functioning, by comparing it on the process level with the neighbouring concept of overall coping functioning. A total of N=32 patients, mainly presenting adjustment disorder, were included in the study. The patients underwent STDP up to 40 sessions; three sessions per psychotherapy were transcribed and analyzed by using two observer‐rating scales: Defense Mechanism Rating Scales (Perry, 1990) and Coping Action Patterns (Perry, Drapeau, Dunkley, & Blake, 2005). Hierarchical linear modeling was applied to model the change over the course of therapy and relate it to outcome. Results suggest that STDP has an effect on the target variable of overall defensive functioning, which was absent for overall coping functioning. Links with outcome confirm the importance of the effect. These results are discussed from methodological and clinical viewpoints. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 66:1–10, 2010.
Bibliography:istex:346CA514E0E744059F2ADA243B1835CBCC0F844E
ArticleID:JCLP20719
Parts of this article were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR) in Barcelona, June 18-21, 2008, and at the Annual Conference of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN), in Berlin, November 26-29, 2008. This research was supported by the Swiss FNRS Grant 3200BO-100706/1.
ark:/67375/WNG-CXCK3LPD-L
Parts of this article were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR) in Barcelona, June 18–21, 2008, and at the Annual Conference of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN), in Berlin, November 26–29, 2008. This research was supported by the Swiss FNRS Grant 3200BO‐100706/1.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/jclp.20719