Comparison of bioassays and laboratory assays for apple stem grooving virus
The standard field double-budding assay with the indicator Virginia Crab and the glasshouse test with the indicator Malus micromalus, were compared with ELISA and immunocapture PCR for the detection of Apple stem grooving virus (ASGV) in 102 apple trees and three oriental pear. Twenty-two trees were...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of virological methods Vol. 93; no. 1; pp. 167 - 173 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
Elsevier B.V
01-04-2001
Amsterdam Elsevier New York, NY |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The standard field double-budding assay with the indicator Virginia Crab and the glasshouse test with the indicator
Malus micromalus, were compared with ELISA and immunocapture PCR for the detection of
Apple stem grooving virus (ASGV) in 102 apple trees and three oriental pear. Twenty-two trees were positive for ASGV by both ELISA and IC-PCR but three of these trees were negative by Virginia Crab, three were negative by
M. micromalus and one was negative by both these bioassays. The infected trees were re-tested by IC-PCR and ELISA in a second year; the IC-PCR results were confirmed but two of the 22 infected trees were negative by ELISA. On this evidence, IC-PCR is a more reliable assay for ASGV than the slow and expensive bioassays. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0166-0934 1879-0984 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00271-3 |