The Use of Flow Diverter in Ruptured, Dissecting Intracranial Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation

• Published in: World neurosurgery Vol. 111; pp. e424 - e433
• Main Authors: Maus, Volker, Mpotsaris, Anastasios, Dorn, Franziska, Möhlenbruch, Markus, Borggrefe, Jan, Stavrinou, Pantelis, Abdullayev, Nuran, Barnikol, Utako Birgit, Liebig, Thomas, Kabbasch, Christoph
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-03-2018
• Subjects: Acutely dissecting aneurysms; Flow diverter; Intracranial aneurysms; SAH; Flow diverter; Intracranial aneurysms; PICA; Acutely dissecting aneurysms; DSA; MRI; FRED; SAH; VA; WFNS; PED; mRS
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.095
• EISSN: 1878-8769
• ISSN: 1878-8750

Acute dissecting aneurysms of the posterior circulation are a rare cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Established endovascular treatment options include parent artery occlusion and stent-assisted coiling, but appear to be associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Vessel reconstruction with flow diverters is an alternative treatment option; however, its safety and efficacy in the acute stage remains unclear.
This is a multicentric retrospective analysis of 15 consecutive acutely ruptured dissecting posterior circulation aneurysms treated with flow diverters. The primary end point was favorable aneurysm occlusion, defined as OKM C1-3 and D (O'Kelly Marotta scale). Secondary end points were procedure-related complications and clinical outcome.
Nine of 15 aneurysms (60%) arose from the intradural portion of the vertebral artery, 3 were located on the posterior inferior cerebellar artery and 1 each on the anterior inferior cerebellar artery, posterior cerebral artery, and basilar artery. Flow diverter placement was technically successful in 14 of 15 cases (93%). After endovascular treatment, none of the ruptured aneurysms rebled. Median clinical follow-up was 217 days and median angiographic follow-up was 203 days. Favorable occlusion was observed in 7 of 14 aneurysms (50%) directly after flow diverter placement; of those, 5 were completely occluded (36%). Seven patients (47%) with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage died in the acute phase. Favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤2) was observed in 4 of 15 patients (27%) and a moderate outcome (modified Rankin scale 3/4) was observed in 5 of 15 patients (33%). All aneurysms showed complete occlusion at follow-up.
Flow diverters might be a feasible, alternative treatment option for acutely ruptured dissecting posterior circulation aneurysms and may effectively prevent rebleeding. Larger cohort studies are required to validate these results.