Dopaminergic and serotonergic properties of fluoxetine
1. 1. Rats were trained to Discriminate I.P. injections of a 5-HT agonist, LSD (0.08 mg/kg, n = 12) or a DA agonist, cocaine (10 mg/kg; n = 16) in a two lever, drug discrimination situation. 2. 2. Animals were tested with fluoxetine (0.625–10 mg/kg) alone and in combination with low doses of the tra...
Saved in:
Published in: | Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 169 - 181 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Amsterdam
Elsevier Inc
1997
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | 1.
1. Rats were trained to Discriminate I.P. injections of a 5-HT agonist, LSD (0.08 mg/kg, n = 12) or a DA agonist, cocaine (10 mg/kg; n = 16) in a two lever, drug discrimination situation.
2.
2. Animals were tested with fluoxetine (0.625–10 mg/kg) alone and in combination with low doses of the training drugs.
3.
3. Fluoxetine did not substitute for either LSD or cocaine at any dose tested. A relatively low dose of fluoxetine (2.5 mg/kg) potentiated the discriminability of cocaine (2.5 mg/kg) from saline. A higher dose of fluoxetine (5.0 mg/kg) significantly enhanced the effects of a low dose of LSD (0.02 mg/kg), but only to 41.7% responses on the LSD-appropriate lever.
4.
4. The data suggest that fluoxetine alters the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine to a greater extent than those of LSD.
5.
5. The ability of fluoxetine to potentiate the cocaine cue (but not to substitute for cocaine) suggests that both of these drugs affect DA systems, but do so through different mechanisms. For example, fluoxetine may not inhibit DA reuptake (to the same extent as cocaine), but may have other dopaminergic actions such as increasing DA receptor density. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0278-5846 1878-4216 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0278-5846(96)00167-4 |