Socio-technical analysis of a sanitation innovation in a peri-urban household in Durban, South Africa

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 755; no. Pt 2; p. 143284
• Main Authors: Sutherland, Catherine, Reynaert, Eva, Dhlamini, Sifiso, Magwaza, Fanelesibonge, Lienert, Juri, Riechmann, Michel E., Buthelezi, Sibongile, Khumalo, Duduzile, Morgenroth, Eberhard, Udert, Kai M., Sindall, Rebecca C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 10-02-2021
• Subjects: Family Characteristics; Field test; Hygiene; Sanitation; Service delivery; Social acceptance; Source separation; South Africa; Transdisciplinary research; Water reuse; Water Supply; South Africa; Service delivery; Source separation; Field test; Transdisciplinary research; Water reuse; Social acceptance
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143284
• EISSN: 1879-1026
• ISSN: 0048-9697

The provision of water and sanitation for all that is safe, dignified, reliable, affordable and sustainable is a major global challenge. While centralized sewer-based sanitation systems remain the dominant approach to providing sanitation, the benefits of non-sewered onsite sanitation systems are increasingly being recognised. This paper presents the outcomes of the testing of the Blue Diversion Autarky Toilet (BDAT), a sanitation system providing hygiene and dignity without relying on water and wastewater infrastructure, in a peri-urban household in Durban, South Africa. The BDAT was used by a single household as their only form of sanitation during three months of technical and social testing. An analysis based on technical data in combination with interpretive, qualitative research methods revealed that the BDAT functioned well and achieved high levels of social acceptance in the test household. The flushing, cleanliness and odour-free nature of the sanitation technology, its functionality, the household's previous sanitation experience, and their experience with and understanding of water scarcity, were the main factors underpinning their positive response to this innovation in sanitation. The testing process resulted in broader developmental benefits for the household, including improved basic services due to the upgrading of the electrical and existing sanitation system, social learning, and improved relationships between household members and the local state. A transdisciplinary research process, which emerged through the assessment, enabled the integration of different forms of knowledge from multiple actors to address the complexity of problems related to the development of socially just sanitation. The benefit of engaging with societal actors in sanitation innovation and assessing its outcomes using both the technical and social sciences is evident in this paper.
[Display omitted]
•Assessing a novel toilet requires input from engineers, social scientists and users.•Existing sanitation and the exceptionalism of testing affect social acceptance.•Users have a high tolerance of sanitation failures, but this system functioned well.•Users wanted more detail on the science of water recycling from trusted informants.•Transdisciplinarity is central to the development of socially just sanitation.