Separating arterial and venous components from 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies using factor analysis

Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI has been used extensively for angiography but in order to generate separate arterial and venous images some form of postprocessing is required. This typically involves the subtraction of one image in a dynamic sequence from another in order to suppress unwanted signal;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Magnetic resonance in medicine Vol. 49; no. 5; pp. 928 - 933
Main Authors: Martel, Anne L., Fraser, Doug, Delay, G. Steve, Morgan, Paul S., Moody, Alan R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-05-2003
Williams & Wilkins
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI has been used extensively for angiography but in order to generate separate arterial and venous images some form of postprocessing is required. This typically involves the subtraction of one image in a dynamic sequence from another in order to suppress unwanted signal; however, this also has the effect of decreasing the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) of the image. In this study, factor analysis, a technique related to eigenimage filtering, is used to separate arterial and venous components from dynamic contrast‐enhanced images of the legs acquired with a temporal resolution of 30 sec. The SNR of the venous and arterial images extracted from a series of 20 patients using conventional single subtraction, a double subtraction method, and factor analysis were compared. Results show that the use of factor analysis improved the SNR in the venous images by a factor of 2.3 compared with the use of simple subtraction. A subjective comparison of the maximum intensity projection images generated from the venous images was also carried out and showed a significant preference for those generated using factor analysis over those generated using other subtraction methods. Magn Reson Med 49:928–933, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:517DA43401AC130A5AB214BEE28826415EB8FE4D
ArticleID:MRM10462
ark:/67375/WNG-CGK7WCH3-G
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.10462