The cellular manufacturing paradox: a critical review of simulation studies

Purpose - A number of simulation studies have been conducted previously by several researchers, in order to compare the performance of cellular and functional layouts. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the lack of objectivity of a number of these studies, in order to explain the origin of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of manufacturing technology management Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 591 - 606
Main Authors: Chtourou, Hédi, Jerbi, Abdessalem, Maalej, Aref Y
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Bradford Emerald Group Publishing Limited 06-06-2008
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose - A number of simulation studies have been conducted previously by several researchers, in order to compare the performance of cellular and functional layouts. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the lack of objectivity of a number of these studies, in order to explain the origin of their conflicting conclusions.Design methodology approach - A taxonomy of the main experimental factors and performance measure used in the main simulation comparative studies is followed by a critical assessment of ten of these studies. The analysis is focused on the objectivity of the layout comparison methodologies. Then, the determined shortcomings are categorized and some of them are illustrated by way of simulation.Findings - The revealed shortcomings are most likely responsible for the conflicting conclusions of the studies and may well explain what is called in the literature the "cellular paradox."Originality value - This work sets up the basis for an objective comparison methodology between the two manufacturing system layouts. Such a methodology should in fact be free of all the highlighted objectivity flaws.
Bibliography:istex:6D7D5579D8E59E461F5624B436D6246ADE1B2C28
original-pdf:0680190503.pdf
filenameID:0680190503
href:17410380810877276.pdf
ark:/67375/4W2-GNNSXGMM-G
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1741-038X
1758-7786
DOI:10.1108/17410380810877276