Why critical literacy should turn to 'the affective turn': making a case for critical affective literacy

The central argument of this essay is that critical literacy with a rationalistic bent may not enable us to cope with ethical dilemmas in our responsiveness to human sufferings. I argue that critical literacy education would benefit from turning to the recent scholarship on affect/emotion studies. I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Discourse (Abingdon, England) Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 381 - 396
Main Author: Ahmed, Anwar
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Abingdon Routledge 03-05-2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The central argument of this essay is that critical literacy with a rationalistic bent may not enable us to cope with ethical dilemmas in our responsiveness to human sufferings. I argue that critical literacy education would benefit from turning to the recent scholarship on affect/emotion studies. I draw upon the works of Sara Ahmed - one of the leading contributors to critical affect studies - to shed light on what is called a regulatory power that creates a schism in our responsiveness to violence and suffering. The key contribution of this essay is to present an actionable framework of what I describe as critical affective literacy. To delineate this framework, I present four pedagogical principles, along with examples of instructional activities.
Bibliography:Refereed article. Includes bibliographical references.
Discourse; v.37 n.3 p.381-396; June 2016
ISSN:0159-6306
1469-3739
DOI:10.1080/01596306.2015.1042429