Why critical literacy should turn to 'the affective turn': making a case for critical affective literacy
The central argument of this essay is that critical literacy with a rationalistic bent may not enable us to cope with ethical dilemmas in our responsiveness to human sufferings. I argue that critical literacy education would benefit from turning to the recent scholarship on affect/emotion studies. I...
Saved in:
Published in: | Discourse (Abingdon, England) Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 381 - 396 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Abingdon
Routledge
03-05-2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The central argument of this essay is that critical literacy with a rationalistic bent may not enable us to cope with ethical dilemmas in our responsiveness to human sufferings. I argue that critical literacy education would benefit from turning to the recent scholarship on affect/emotion studies. I draw upon the works of Sara Ahmed - one of the leading contributors to critical affect studies - to shed light on what is called a regulatory power that creates a schism in our responsiveness to violence and suffering. The key contribution of this essay is to present an actionable framework of what I describe as critical affective literacy. To delineate this framework, I present four pedagogical principles, along with examples of instructional activities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Refereed article. Includes bibliographical references. Discourse; v.37 n.3 p.381-396; June 2016 |
ISSN: | 0159-6306 1469-3739 |
DOI: | 10.1080/01596306.2015.1042429 |