Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial

Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in oncology Vol. 13; p. 1143716
Main Authors: Nguyen, Paul V, Donneaux, Bertrand, Louis, Céline, Bodgal, Zsuzsa, Philippi, Sven, Biver, Sylvie, Frederick, Bérangère, Harzé, Ludovic, Lasar, Yves, Vogin, Guillaume, Nickers, Philippe
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 06-04-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Patients were recruited in 2016-2019 if they had: localized CAPRA ≤ 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS≥4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. Over a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with ≥1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade ≥3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). Focal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Michael Pinkawa, Robert Janker Clinic, Germany; Simon Spohn, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany
This article was submitted to Radiation Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Edited by: Shafak Aluwini, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716