Newborn resuscitation in Gombe State, northeastern Nigeria

• Published in: Journal of global health Vol. 8; no. 2; p. 020420
• Main Authors: Exley, Josephine Lr, Umar, Nasir, Moxon, Sarah, Usman, Adamu Umar, Marchant, Tanya
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scotland Edinburgh University Global Health Society 01-12-2018
• Subjects: Asphyxia Neonatorum - therapy; Babies; Births; Childrens health; Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data; Delivery, Obstetric; Equipment and Supplies - supply & distribution; Female; Global health; Health Care Surveys; Health facilities; Health Facilities - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Hygiene; Infant, Newborn; Information systems; Lifesaving; Local government; Male; Midwifery; Mortality; Newborn babies; Nigeria; Pregnancy; Primary care; Resuscitation; Simulation; Supervision; United Kingdom > UK; Nigeria
• ISSN: 2047-2978; 2047-2986
• DOI: 10.7189/jogh.08.020420

Basic newborn resuscitation for babies not breathing at birth is a highly effective intervention and its scale-up identified as a top research priority. However, tracking progress on the scale-up and coverage of this intervention is compromised by limitations in measuring both the number of newborns receiving the intervention and the number of newborns requiring the intervention. Using data from a facility and birth attendant survey in Gombe State, Nigeria, we aimed to advance the measurement agenda by developing a proxy indicator defined as the "percent of newborns born in a facility with the potential to provide newborn resuscitation".
The indicator's denominator was defined as: the total number of births in facilities during a defined time period (facility records). The numerator was constructed from the number of those births that occurred in appropriately equipped facilities (facility inventory), where a birth attendant demonstrated basic resuscitation competence (assessed by a simulation exercise). The proportion of facility-births that took place in a setting with the potential to provide newborn resuscitation was then calculated.
The analysis included 17 383 births that occurred during May-October 2015 in 117 primary and referral facilities surveyed in November 2015. Overall 81% of the facilities did not have all items of essential equipment required for resuscitation; the items of equipment least frequently present included a timing device and resuscitation bag with two sizes of neonatal face mask. Only 3% of 117 birth attendants interviewed demonstrated competence to undertake resuscitation, all of whom were classified as skilled attendants and worked in referral facilities. We found that 20% of the 17 383 births took place in a facility with the potential to provide lifesaving resuscitation care.
The indicator definition of neonatal resuscitation presented here responds to the need to advance the measurement agenda for newborn care and importantly adjusts for the volume of births occurring in different facilities. Its application in this setting revealed substantial missed opportunities to providing lifesaving care and highlights the need for a greater focus on input as well as process quality in all levels of health facilities.