Modified underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for intermediate-sized sessile colorectal polyps

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is effective for treating intermediate-sized colorectal polyps. However, it is sometimes difficult to obtain visibility in underwater conditions. This prospective, observational, single-center study included consecutive patients with intermediate-sized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in medicine Vol. 10; p. 1200145
Main Authors: Kim, Dong Hyun, Park, Seon-Young, You, Hye-Su, Jung, Yong-Wook, Joo, Young-Eun, Myung, Dae-Seong, Kim, Hyun-Soo, Kim, Nah Ihm, Kim, Seong-Jung, Ju, Jae Kyun
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 20-06-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is effective for treating intermediate-sized colorectal polyps. However, it is sometimes difficult to obtain visibility in underwater conditions. This prospective, observational, single-center study included consecutive patients with intermediate-sized (10-20 mm) sessile colorectal polyps. Modified UEMR method was used to initially snare the lesion without injection or water infusion. Thereafter, water was infused until the lesion was submerged, then it was resected using electrocautery. We also evaluated the rates of complete resection and procedure-related complications. Forty-two patients with 47 polyps were enrolled in the study. The median procedure time and fluid infusion were 71 s (42-607) and 50 mL (30-130), respectively. The rates of R0 resection and resection were 80.9 and 97.9%, respectively, with 100% technical success. R0 resection was observed in 42.9% of polyps sized ≥15 mm and 87.5% sized <15 mm (  < 0.01). Muscle entrapment was found in 71.4% of patients with polyps sized ≥15 mm and 10% <15 mm (  < 0.01). Immediate bleeding occurred in 12.8% of cases and was controlled using a snare tip or hemostatic forceps. Snare-tip ablation and hemostatic forceps ablation were performed in 27.7 and 6.4% of patients, respectively. No delayed bleeding, perforation, or any other complications were reported. Modified UEMR can be used in cases in which securing visibility or performing the existing UEMR is challenging. Careful treatment is required when removing polyps >15 mm in size.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Beishi Zheng, Metropolitan College of New York, United States; Mitsushige Sugimoto, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Japan
Edited by: Zhen Li, Shandong University, China
ISSN:2296-858X
2296-858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1200145