Carvedilol in Dogs with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

• Published in: Journal of veterinary internal medicine Vol. 21; no. 6; pp. 1272 - 1279
• Main Authors: Oyama, M.A, Sisson, D.D, Prosek, R, Bulmer, B.J, Luethy, M.W, Luis Fuentes, V
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-11-2007
• Subjects: Animals; beta-adrenergic antagonists; Beta-blocker treatment; Carbazoles - therapeutic use; cardiomyopathy; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated - drug therapy; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated - veterinary; Carvedilol; case studies; Dog Diseases - drug therapy; Dogs; Heart disease; heart diseases; Neurohormones; Propanolamines - therapeutic use; Quality of life; statistical analysis; Vasodilator Agents - therapeutic use; Ventricular remodeling
• ISSN: 0891-6640; 1939-1676
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.tb01949.x

Background: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by reduced systolic function, heightened sympathetic tone, and high morbidity and mortality. Little is known regarding the safety and efficacy of ß‐blocker treatment in dogs with DCM.
Hypothesis: Carvedilol improves echocardiographic and neurohormonal variables in dogs with DCM over a 4‐month treatment period.
Methods: Prospective, placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded randomized study. Dogs with DCM underwent echocardiography, ECG, thoracic radiographs, and neurohormonal profiling, followed by titration onto Carvedilol (0.3 mg/kg q12h) or placebo over a 4‐week period and subsequently received 3 months of therapy. Primary study endpoints included left ventricular volume and function.
Results: Sixteen dogs received carvedilol and 7 received placebo. At study end, 13 carvedilol dogs and 5 placebo dogs were alive. There was no difference in the mean percentage change in left ventricular volume at end‐diastole (LVVd), left ventricular end‐systolic volume (LVVs), and ejection fraction (EF) between treatment groups, suggesting that both groups experienced similar amounts of disease progression. Carvedilol treatment did not result in significant changes in neurohormonal activation, radiographic heart size, heart rate, or owner perceived quality‐of‐life. Baseline B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) predicted dogs in the carvedilol‐treated group that maintained or improved their EF over the study duration.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Carvedilol administration did not improve echocardiographic or neurohormonal indicators of heart function. The lack of effect may be related to severity of disease, carvedilol dose, or brevity of follow‐up time. Statistical power of the present study was adversely affected by a high fatality rate in study dogs and small sample size.