Efficacy of a Lidocaine-Impregnated Elastrator Band for Castration and Tail Docking in Lambs
The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) with respect to the efficacy of castration and tail docking. Secondary objectives were to compare castration and tail-docking success, evaluate local...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Animals (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 10; p. 1403 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
01-05-2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) with respect to the efficacy of castration and tail docking. Secondary objectives were to compare castration and tail-docking success, evaluate local site reactions, and compare average daily gain (ADG) between the treatment groups. A total of 238 male lambs were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LLBs or CBs on their tail and scrotum. Lambs were weighed, had a health assessment, and the band site was observed on -3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after the bands were applied. A linear regression model was built to assess average daily gain, whereas a repeated measures model was used to evaluate body weight differences at each of the measured timepoints. Furthermore, logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations with casting outcomes. Few differences were noted between treatment groups with respect to casting success for the scrotum and tail and ADG over the entire experimental period. Non-inferiority calculations demonstrated no differences in tail docking and scrotal casting success, with casting occurring for the majority of animals by d 21 and d 42 for castration and tail docking, respectively. However, lambs receiving LLBs gained more weight from d -3 to 7 (+0.03 kg/d; 95% CI: 0 to 0.07), which may be an indication of effective pain control during the first week following band application. Overall, the use of an LLB does not affect the time to successful casting of the tail and could improve short-term growth when compared to a control band. Further studies are needed to compare LLBs to multimodal methods of pain relief. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) with respect to the efficacy of castration and tail docking. Secondary objectives were to compare castration and tail-docking success, evaluate local site reactions, and compare average daily gain (ADG) between the treatment groups. A total of 238 male lambs were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LLBs or CBs on their tail and scrotum. Lambs were weighed, had a health assessment, and the band site was observed on -3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after the bands were applied. A linear regression model was built to assess average daily gain, whereas a repeated measures model was used to evaluate body weight differences at each of the measured timepoints. Furthermore, logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations with casting outcomes. Few differences were noted between treatment groups with respect to casting success for the scrotum and tail and ADG over the entire experimental period. Non-inferiority calculations demonstrated no differences in tail docking and scrotal casting success, with casting occurring for the majority of animals by d 21 and d 42 for castration and tail docking, respectively. However, lambs receiving LLBs gained more weight from d -3 to 7 (+0.03 kg/d; 95% CI: 0 to 0.07), which may be an indication of effective pain control during the first week following band application. Overall, the use of an LLB does not affect the time to successful casting of the tail and could improve short-term growth when compared to a control band. Further studies are needed to compare LLBs to multimodal methods of pain relief. Tail docking and castration are common procedures performed in lambs but are considered painful. Mitigation of the pain associated with these procedures is difficult, especially when using rubber ring castration. The objectives of this study were to compare castration and tail docking efficacy between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) under field conditions and identify the benefits of pain control provided by LLBs. In this study, 238 male lambs were randomly assigned to receive either LLBs or CBs on both their tail and scrotum. CBs and LLBs were both 100% effective with respect to casting success of the tail and scrotum. Lambs receiving LLBs gained more weight from d −3 to 7 following application, which may be an indication of pain control during the first week following band application. However, there were no differences observed in average daily gain over the entire study period. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) with respect to the efficacy of castration and tail docking. Secondary objectives were to compare castration and tail-docking success, evaluate local site reactions, and compare average daily gain (ADG) between the treatment groups. A total of 238 male lambs were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LLBs or CBs on their tail and scrotum. Lambs were weighed, had a health assessment, and the band site was observed on −3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after the bands were applied. A linear regression model was built to assess average daily gain, whereas a repeated measures model was used to evaluate body weight differences at each of the measured timepoints. Furthermore, logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations with casting outcomes. Few differences were noted between treatment groups with respect to casting success for the scrotum and tail and ADG over the entire experimental period. Non-inferiority calculations demonstrated no differences in tail docking and scrotal casting success, with casting occurring for the majority of animals by d 21 and d 42 for castration and tail docking, respectively. However, lambs receiving LLBs gained more weight from d −3 to 7 (+0.03 kg/d; 95% CI: 0 to 0.07), which may be an indication of effective pain control during the first week following band application. Overall, the use of an LLB does not affect the time to successful casting of the tail and could improve short-term growth when compared to a control band. Further studies are needed to compare LLBs to multimodal methods of pain relief. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) with respect to the efficacy of castration and tail docking. Secondary objectives were to compare castration and tail-docking success, evaluate local site reactions, and compare average daily gain (ADG) between the treatment groups. A total of 238 male lambs were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LLBs or CBs on their tail and scrotum. Lambs were weighed, had a health assessment, and the band site was observed on −3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after the bands were applied. A linear regression model was built to assess average daily gain, whereas a repeated measures model was used to evaluate body weight differences at each of the measured timepoints. Furthermore, logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations with casting outcomes. Few differences were noted between treatment groups with respect to casting success for the scrotum and tail and ADG over the entire experimental period. Non-inferiority calculations demonstrated no differences in tail docking and scrotal casting success, with casting occurring for the majority of animals by d 21 and d 42 for castration and tail docking, respectively. However, lambs receiving LLBs gained more weight from d −3 to 7 (+0.03 kg/d; 95% CI: 0 to 0.07), which may be an indication of effective pain control during the first week following band application. Overall, the use of an LLB does not affect the time to successful casting of the tail and could improve short-term growth when compared to a control band. Further studies are needed to compare LLBs to multimodal methods of pain relief. Tail docking and castration are common procedures performed in lambs but are considered painful. Mitigation of the pain associated with these procedures is difficult, especially when using rubber ring castration. The objectives of this study were to compare castration and tail docking efficacy between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) under field conditions and identify the benefits of pain control provided by LLBs. In this study, 238 male lambs were randomly assigned to receive either LLBs or CBs on both their tail and scrotum. CBs and LLBs were both 100% effective with respect to casting success of the tail and scrotum. Lambs receiving LLBs gained more weight from d −3 to 7 following application, which may be an indication of pain control during the first week following band application. However, there were no differences observed in average daily gain over the entire study period. Simple SummaryTail docking and castration are common procedures performed in lambs but are considered painful. Mitigation of the pain associated with these procedures is difficult, especially when using rubber ring castration. The objectives of this study were to compare castration and tail docking efficacy between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) under field conditions and identify the benefits of pain control provided by LLBs. In this study, 238 male lambs were randomly assigned to receive either LLBs or CBs on both their tail and scrotum. CBs and LLBs were both 100% effective with respect to casting success of the tail and scrotum. Lambs receiving LLBs gained more weight from d −3 to 7 following application, which may be an indication of pain control during the first week following band application. However, there were no differences observed in average daily gain over the entire study period.AbstractThe primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) with respect to the efficacy of castration and tail docking. Secondary objectives were to compare castration and tail-docking success, evaluate local site reactions, and compare average daily gain (ADG) between the treatment groups. A total of 238 male lambs were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LLBs or CBs on their tail and scrotum. Lambs were weighed, had a health assessment, and the band site was observed on −3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after the bands were applied. A linear regression model was built to assess average daily gain, whereas a repeated measures model was used to evaluate body weight differences at each of the measured timepoints. Furthermore, logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations with casting outcomes. Few differences were noted between treatment groups with respect to casting success for the scrotum and tail and ADG over the entire experimental period. Non-inferiority calculations demonstrated no differences in tail docking and scrotal casting success, with casting occurring for the majority of animals by d 21 and d 42 for castration and tail docking, respectively. However, lambs receiving LLBs gained more weight from d −3 to 7 (+0.03 kg/d; 95% CI: 0 to 0.07), which may be an indication of effective pain control during the first week following band application. Overall, the use of an LLB does not affect the time to successful casting of the tail and could improve short-term growth when compared to a control band. Further studies are needed to compare LLBs to multimodal methods of pain relief. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Beaugrand, Kendall Roche, Steven M Ralston, Brenda J Olson, Barbara Allan, Nicolas Schatz, Crystal Olson, Merle Broomfield, Madeleine A Sharpe, Brendan D Ross, Joseph A |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Steven M orcidid: 0000-0001-6934-6497 surname: Roche fullname: Roche, Steven M organization: ACER Consulting Limited, Guelph, ON N1G 5L3, Canada – sequence: 2 givenname: Brenda J orcidid: 0000-0002-2757-1212 surname: Ralston fullname: Ralston, Brenda J organization: Applied Research Team, Lakeland College, Vermilion, AB T9X 1K5, Canada – sequence: 3 givenname: Barbara surname: Olson fullname: Olson, Barbara organization: Alberta Veterinary Laboratories, Calgary, AB T2C 5N6, Canada – sequence: 4 givenname: Brendan D surname: Sharpe fullname: Sharpe, Brendan D organization: Invetus Pty Ltd., Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia – sequence: 5 givenname: Crystal surname: Schatz fullname: Schatz, Crystal organization: Chinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB T4A 0C3, Canada – sequence: 6 givenname: Kendall surname: Beaugrand fullname: Beaugrand, Kendall organization: Chinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB T4A 0C3, Canada – sequence: 7 givenname: Joseph A orcidid: 0000-0002-0432-8383 surname: Ross fullname: Ross, Joseph A organization: Chinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB T4A 0C3, Canada – sequence: 8 givenname: Madeleine A surname: Broomfield fullname: Broomfield, Madeleine A organization: Invetus Pty Ltd., Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia – sequence: 9 givenname: Nicolas orcidid: 0000-0003-1993-5554 surname: Allan fullname: Allan, Nicolas organization: Chinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB T4A 0C3, Canada – sequence: 10 givenname: Merle surname: Olson fullname: Olson, Merle organization: Alberta Veterinary Laboratories, Calgary, AB T2C 5N6, Canada |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38791621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNptks9vFCEUxyemxtbak3dD4sXEbOUNMAzHuq66ySZe6s2EvOHHhnUGVpg99L-XdWutRiDh5ZvP-8KD97w5iym6pnkJ9JoxRd9hDMCBAqfsSXPRUtkt2g7E2aP4vLkqZUfrkIKBgGfNOeulgq6Fi-bbyvtg0NyR5AmSTbDJYIhusZ722W0jzs6S1YhlzjinTN5jtMTXYHmSQorkKN1iGMmHZL6HuCUhkg1OQ3nRPPU4Fnd1v182Xz-ubpefF5svn9bLm83CcJDzYrAeLAiUthtADMYqVFy1SEGi68Bxy3pU1GHLPOvQSgtgBe98z51QINllsz752oQ7vc9hwnynEwb9S0h5qzHPwYxOD06q-gwMJTN8AN47JUQnuakLewvV683Ja5_Tj4Mrs55CMW4cMbp0KJrRjrKe0Z5W9PU_6C4dcqyVVkqoVjDRiz_UFuv5IfpU380cTfWNVIL1oPixhOv_UHVaNwVT_9yHqv-V8PaUYHIqJTv_UDdQfWwN_ag1Kv3q_qqHYXL2gf3dCOwn2F-xWg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14131901 |
| Cites_doi | 10.3390/ani14020255 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00388.x 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2009.00546.x 10.3390/ani11041127 10.3390/ani14060977 10.1016/S1090-0233(98)80033-6 10.1053/rvsc.1998.0252 10.4102/jsava.v83i1.1 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100018 10.3390/ani10122363 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.01.006 10.1080/00480169.2022.2135626 10.1007/s002689900403 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00170-2 10.1136/vr.134.18.463 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.11.002 10.1016/0034-5288(91)90005-9 10.3390/ani12182459 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.011 10.1016/S1090-0233(97)80013-5 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104914 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.029 10.1016/0034-5288(93)90087-V 10.3390/ani11061483 10.15232/aas.2020-02106 10.1111/vaa.12280 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00654.x 10.1017/S0962728600022004 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.001 10.1093/bja/aeh264 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00716.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG – notice: 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 DOA |
| DOI | 10.3390/ani14101403 |
| DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Zoology |
| EISSN | 2076-2615 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_be797533a73c4b148e955674c74ca8d1 A795381947 10_3390_ani14101403 38791621 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Australia Canada United States--US |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Canada – name: Australia – name: United States--US |
| GroupedDBID | 5VS 7XC 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAHBH ABDBF AFKRA AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS APEBS ATCPS BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DIK EAD EAP EPL ESX GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ HYE IAO ISR ITC LK8 M0K M48 M7P MODMG M~E NPM OK1 OZF PATMY PGMZT PIMPY PROAC PYCSY RPM TUS ZBA AAYXX CITATION ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-bdf1d15a7d6b15bcd9a9492a017ae61e4d38a90ea23f36ad7d11d546f84e59173 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISSN | 2076-2615 |
| IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:15:58 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 05:14:28 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 19:24:22 EDT 2024 Tue Nov 19 21:34:54 EST 2024 Tue Nov 12 23:48:38 EST 2024 Fri Nov 22 00:18:09 EST 2024 Sat Nov 02 12:17:27 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 10 |
| Keywords | elastrator anesthetic growth pain control weight gain |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c417t-bdf1d15a7d6b15bcd9a9492a017ae61e4d38a90ea23f36ad7d11d546f84e59173 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1993-5554 0000-0002-2757-1212 0000-0001-6934-6497 0000-0002-0432-8383 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/be797533a73c4b148e955674c74ca8d1 |
| PMID | 38791621 |
| PQID | 3059253585 |
| PQPubID | 2032438 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_be797533a73c4b148e955674c74ca8d1 proquest_miscellaneous_3060383080 proquest_journals_3059253585 gale_infotracmisc_A795381947 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A795381947 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14101403 pubmed_primary_38791621 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-05-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2024 text: 2024-05-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland – name: Basel |
| PublicationTitle | Animals (Basel) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Animals (Basel) |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG |
| Publisher_xml | – name: MDPI AG |
| References | French (ref_1) 1994; 134 Grant (ref_5) 2004; 87 ref_11 Gascoigne (ref_3) 2021; 43 Lener (ref_24) 1997; 23 Lizarraga (ref_32) 2013; 197 Lomax (ref_16) 2010; 88 Mellor (ref_6) 1991; 51 Thornton (ref_7) 1999; 66 Jamshidzadeh (ref_25) 2010; 23 ref_17 Meintjes (ref_4) 2012; 193 Molony (ref_9) 1993; 55 Scobie (ref_2) 1999; 8 Kells (ref_12) 2019; 222 Melches (ref_36) 2007; 173 Ghadirian (ref_34) 2016; 43 Drucker (ref_29) 1998; 22 Kongara (ref_8) 2023; 71 Pollard (ref_15) 2001; 71 Bisla (ref_30) 1992; 33 Rodrigues (ref_31) 2011; 19 Jones (ref_27) 2021; 15 Estebe (ref_33) 2004; 93 ref_23 ref_22 ref_21 ref_20 Graham (ref_14) 1997; 153 Kent (ref_10) 1998; 155 ref_28 Rostami (ref_35) 2012; 83 ref_26 Coetzee (ref_19) 2013; 29 Kleinhenz (ref_18) 2020; 37 Paull (ref_13) 2012; 39 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref_22 doi: 10.3390/ani14020255 – volume: 43 start-page: 152 year: 2021 ident: ref_3 article-title: Considering the 3Rs for castration and tail docking in sheep publication-title: InPrac contributor: fullname: Gascoigne – volume: 23 start-page: 673 year: 1997 ident: ref_24 article-title: Topical anesthetic agents in dermatologic surgery. A review publication-title: Dermatol. Surg. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00388.x contributor: fullname: Lener – ident: ref_26 – volume: 88 start-page: 67 year: 2010 ident: ref_16 article-title: Topical anaesthesia alleviates short-term pain of castration and tail docking in lambs publication-title: Aust. Vet. J. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2009.00546.x contributor: fullname: Lomax – ident: ref_11 – ident: ref_28 doi: 10.3390/ani11041127 – ident: ref_23 doi: 10.3390/ani14060977 – volume: 33 start-page: 3029 year: 1992 ident: ref_30 article-title: Concentration-dependent effects of lidocaine on corneal epithelial wound healing publication-title: Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. contributor: fullname: Bisla – volume: 155 start-page: 39 year: 1998 ident: ref_10 article-title: Comparison of methods for the reduction of acute pain produced by rubber ring castration or tail docking week-old lambs publication-title: Vet. J. doi: 10.1016/S1090-0233(98)80033-6 contributor: fullname: Kent – volume: 66 start-page: 107 year: 1999 ident: ref_7 article-title: Quantification of the pain and distress responses to castration in young lambs publication-title: Res. Vet. Sci. doi: 10.1053/rvsc.1998.0252 contributor: fullname: Thornton – volume: 83 start-page: 1 year: 2012 ident: ref_35 article-title: The effects of adding epinephrine or xylazine to lidocaine solution for lumbosacral epidural analgesia in fat-tailed sheep publication-title: J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v83i1.1 contributor: fullname: Rostami – volume: 15 start-page: 100018 year: 2021 ident: ref_27 article-title: Using a lamb’s early-life liveweight as a predictor of carcass quality publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100018 contributor: fullname: Jones – ident: ref_21 doi: 10.3390/ani10122363 – volume: 173 start-page: 554 year: 2007 ident: ref_36 article-title: Castration of lambs: A welfare comparison of different castration techniques in lambs over 10 weeks of age publication-title: Vet. J. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.01.006 contributor: fullname: Melches – volume: 71 start-page: 8 year: 2023 ident: ref_8 article-title: Practices and opinions of New Zealand sheep farmers towards pain management in lambs during castration and/or tail docking publication-title: N. Z. Vet. J. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2022.2135626 contributor: fullname: Kongara – volume: 22 start-page: 394 year: 1998 ident: ref_29 article-title: Experimental studies on the effect of lidocaine on wound healing publication-title: World J. Surg. doi: 10.1007/s002689900403 contributor: fullname: Drucker – volume: 71 start-page: 29 year: 2001 ident: ref_15 article-title: Effects of an oral dose of acetyl salicylate at tail docking on the behaviour of lambs aged three to six weeks publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00170-2 contributor: fullname: Pollard – volume: 134 start-page: 463 year: 1994 ident: ref_1 article-title: Lamb tail docking: A controlled field study of the effects of tail amputation on health and productivity publication-title: Vet. Rec. doi: 10.1136/vr.134.18.463 contributor: fullname: French – volume: 29 start-page: 75 year: 2013 ident: ref_19 article-title: Assessment and management of pain associated with castration in cattle publication-title: Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.11.002 contributor: fullname: Coetzee – volume: 51 start-page: 149 year: 1991 ident: ref_6 article-title: Effects of castration on behavior and plasma-cortisol concentrations in young lambs, kids, and calves publication-title: Res. Vet. Sci. doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(91)90005-9 contributor: fullname: Mellor – ident: ref_20 doi: 10.3390/ani12182459 – volume: 87 start-page: 255 year: 2004 ident: ref_5 article-title: Behavioural responses of lambs to common painful husbandry procedures publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.011 contributor: fullname: Grant – volume: 153 start-page: 87 year: 1997 ident: ref_14 article-title: Effects of four analgesic treatments on the behavioural and cortisol responses of 3-week-old lambs to tail docking publication-title: Vet. J. doi: 10.1016/S1090-0233(97)80013-5 contributor: fullname: Graham – volume: 222 start-page: 104914 year: 2019 ident: ref_12 article-title: Effect of analgesic strategies on pain behaviour associated with combined ring castration and hot iron tail docking in Merino lambs publication-title: App Anim. Behav. Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104914 contributor: fullname: Kells – volume: 197 start-page: 515 year: 2013 ident: ref_32 article-title: Comparing lidocaine, bupivacaine and a lidocaine–bupivacaine mixture as a metacarpal block in sheep publication-title: Vet. J. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.029 contributor: fullname: Lizarraga – volume: 55 start-page: 236 year: 1993 ident: ref_9 article-title: Behavioral responses of lambs of three ages in the first three hours after three methods of castration and tail docking publication-title: Res. Vet. Sci. doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(93)90087-V contributor: fullname: Molony – ident: ref_17 doi: 10.3390/ani11061483 – volume: 37 start-page: 77 year: 2020 ident: ref_18 article-title: Invited Review: On-farm pain management of food production animals publication-title: Appl. Anim. Sci. doi: 10.15232/aas.2020-02106 contributor: fullname: Kleinhenz – volume: 43 start-page: 109 year: 2016 ident: ref_34 article-title: Comparison of lidocaine, lidocaine-morphine, lidocaine-tramadol or bupivacaine for neural blockade of the brachial plexus in fat-tailed lambs publication-title: Vet. Anaesth. Analg. doi: 10.1111/vaa.12280 contributor: fullname: Ghadirian – volume: 19 start-page: 223 year: 2011 ident: ref_31 article-title: Effects of lidocaine with epinephrine or with buffer on wound healing in rat skin publication-title: Wound Repair Regen. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00654.x contributor: fullname: Rodrigues – volume: 23 start-page: 83 year: 2010 ident: ref_25 article-title: The effects of some permeability enhancers on the percutaneous absorption of lidocaine publication-title: Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. contributor: fullname: Jamshidzadeh – volume: 8 start-page: 391 year: 1999 ident: ref_2 article-title: A breeding goal to improve the welfare of sheep publication-title: Anim. Welfare doi: 10.1017/S0962728600022004 contributor: fullname: Scobie – volume: 193 start-page: 344 year: 2012 ident: ref_4 article-title: An overview of the physiology of pain for the veterinarian publication-title: Vet. J. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.001 contributor: fullname: Meintjes – volume: 93 start-page: 705 year: 2004 ident: ref_33 article-title: Contralateral effect of amitriptyline and bupivacaine for sciatic nerve block in an animal model of inflammation publication-title: Br. J. Anaesth. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh264 contributor: fullname: Estebe – volume: 39 start-page: 539 year: 2012 ident: ref_13 article-title: Evaluating a novel analgesic strategy for ring castration of ram lambs publication-title: Vet. Anaesth. Analg. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00716.x contributor: fullname: Paull |
| SSID | ssj0000753151 |
| Score | 2.346958 |
| Snippet | The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority between lidocaine-impregnated ligation bands (LLBs) and control bands (CBs) with... Tail docking and castration are common procedures performed in lambs but are considered painful. Mitigation of the pain associated with these procedures is... Simple SummaryTail docking and castration are common procedures performed in lambs but are considered painful. Mitigation of the pain associated with these... |
| SourceID | doaj proquest gale crossref pubmed |
| SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 1403 |
| SubjectTerms | Analysis anesthetic Animals Behavior Care and treatment elastrator Enrollments growth Hormones Lidocaine Pain pain control Sheep Statistical analysis Testes weight gain |
| Title | Efficacy of a Lidocaine-Impregnated Elastrator Band for Castration and Tail Docking in Lambs |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38791621 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3059253585 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3060383080 https://doaj.org/article/be797533a73c4b148e955674c74ca8d1 |
| Volume | 14 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3faxQxEB60UPBFqq26WiWFQp-Wbn7sJvvY1it9KL60gogQZjdJOdE98e4e-t87s7k7evXBF2GfkiwkM0nmm8nkC8BxE6XDVIVSu0qXxjpD-6CuSmki2de-SypwaODqxn764j5OmCZn89QX54RleuAsuNMuWr77qdHq3nQE3mNb1401PX3oQnZ8KvvAmfqej-c02bJ8IU-TX3-Kw5RTGpmebssEjUz9f-_Hj1DmaG0u9-D5CiaKs9y9F_AkDi9h9-tsDILvw7cJMz9gfy9mSaC4ngYySYQXS44RxLuBAGQQEwLGi_EUXZzjEATBU3GBa55cwUW3OP0hyM5wvFxMB3GNP7v5AXy-nNxeXJWrdxLK3ki7KLuQZJA12tB0su760GJrWoW02DA2MpqgHbZVRKWTbjDYIGWoTZMcKYTcNf0KdobZEN-AUEl2KTqp0QSjVHCo66Sjq3qlUlupAo7XovO_Mh2GJzeCJewfSLiAcxbrpglzWI8FpFm_0qz_l2YLOGGleF5pJBoSar4wQD1lzip_Ztua_U1jCzjcakkrpN-uXqvVr1bo3NM-16pak7dUwNGmmv_krLMhzpbcpqnIgydQXcDrPB02Q9LOErJW8u3_GOo7eKYILOVEykPYWfxexvfwdB6WH8Z5_Qf_F_hL |
| link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,866,2107,27934,27935 |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+of+a+Lidocaine-Impregnated+Elastrator+Band+for+Castration+and+Tail+Docking+in+Lambs&rft.jtitle=Animals+%28Basel%29&rft.au=Roche%2C+Steven+M&rft.au=Ralston%2C+Brenda+J&rft.au=Olson%2C+Barbara&rft.au=Sharpe%2C+Brendan+D&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.pub=MDPI+AG&rft.eissn=2076-2615&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1403&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fani14101403&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2076-2615&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2076-2615&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2076-2615&client=summon |