Dorsal dartos flap rotation versus suturing tunica albuginea to the pubic periosteum for correction of penile torsion: A prospective randomized study

Abstract Purpose To compare the results of dorsal dartos flap rotation versus suturing tunica albuginea to the pubic periosteum for correction of congenital penile torsion. Patients and methods Seventeen patients with congenital penile torsion were evaluated and managed from 2006 to 2010. On a rando...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pediatric urology Vol. 9; no. 5; pp. 643 - 647
Main Authors: Aldaqadossi, Hussein A, Elgamal, Samir A, Seif Elnasr, Mohammed K
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-10-2013
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Purpose To compare the results of dorsal dartos flap rotation versus suturing tunica albuginea to the pubic periosteum for correction of congenital penile torsion. Patients and methods Seventeen patients with congenital penile torsion were evaluated and managed from 2006 to 2010. On a random basis, 9 patients underwent surgical repair using a dorsal dartos flap rotation technique (group 1), and 8 patients by suturing tunica albuginea to the pubic periosteum (group 2). All were followed up every 6 months. Results The mean age in group 1 was 52.3 ± 24.8 months, while in group 2 it was 53.4 ± 33.6 months. Mean follow up was 22.3 ± 10.2 and 21.5 ± 7.2 months in group 1 and group 2 respectively. Torsion was corrected in 6 (66.7%) patients of group 1; 3 (33.3%) had residual torsion < 10°. In group 2, correction was achieved in 6 (75.0%) patients and 2 (25.0%) had residual torsion < 10°. The mean operative time was significantly less for group 1 than for group 2: 45.3 ± 7.1 and 74.5 ± 5.3 min, respectively ( P  < 0.0001). Conclusions In short-term prepubertal follow up, both dorsal dartos flap rotation and suturing tunica albuginea to the pubic periosteum are effective for correction of congenital penile torsion. The former technique is easier to perform as it requires much less dissection.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1477-5131
1873-4898
DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.07.014