Chemical communication between males and females of a pupal parasitoid Diapetimorpha introita (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)

Data supporting chemically mediated communication between males and females of a pupal parasitoid Diapetimorpha introita (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) were gathered by field trapping, behavioral bioassays, and electroantennography. Responses of male antennae to live females or their extract were grea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the Entomological Society of America Vol. 91; no. 5; pp. 748 - 753
Main Authors: Jewett, D.K. (Insect Biology and Population Management Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Tifton, GA.), Carpenter, J.E
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Oxford University Press 01-09-1998
Entomological Society of America
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Data supporting chemically mediated communication between males and females of a pupal parasitoid Diapetimorpha introita (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) were gathered by field trapping, behavioral bioassays, and electroantennography. Responses of male antennae to live females or their extract were greater than responses to live males or their extract. Responses to a control were negligible. Responses of female antennae to live insects or a control were the same. Responses to male or female extracts also were the same, but greater than responses to a control. Logarithmic serial dilutions of the female whole-body extract applied to male antennae revealed a dose-response curve with a quadratic fit. Responses of male and female antennae to extracts of tagmata were consistent with responses to whole-body extracts, but a more specific site associated with electrophysiologically active materials was not apparent. In behavioral bioassays and in the field, more males were caught in traps baited with live females than in traps baited with live males or a control. None of the extracts attracted males in the bioassay, and no females were caught in traps in the field.
Bibliography:1997083888
H10
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-8746
1938-2901
DOI:10.1093/aesa/91.5.748