Small for size syndrome following living donor and split liver transplantation

• Published in: World journal of gastrointestinal surgery Vol. 2; no. 12; pp. 389 - 394
• Main Authors: Gonzalez, Hector Daniel, Liu, Zi Wei, Cashman, Sophia, Fusai, Giuseppe K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited 27-12-2010
• Subjects: artery; donors; Hepatic; Hypertension; Liver; Living; Portacaval; Portal; regeneration; shunt; Splenic; Surgical; transplantation; veins; Hypertension; Splenic artery; Surgical; Portacaval shunt; Portal; Hepatic veins; Living donors; Liver regeneration; Liver transplantation
• ISSN: 1948-9366; 1948-9366
• DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i12.389

The field of liver transplantation is limited by the availability of donor organs. The use of living donor and split cadaveric grafts is one potential method of expanding the donor pool. However, primary graft dysfunction can result from the use of partial livers despite the absence of other causes such as vascular obstruction or sepsis. This increasingly recognised phenomenon is termed "Small-for-size syndrome" (SFSS). Studies in animal models and humans have suggested portal hyperperfusion of the graft combined with poor venous outflow and reduced arterial flow might cause sinusoidal congestion and endothelial dysfunction. Graft related factors such as graft to recipient body weight ratio < 0.8, impaired venous outflow, steatosis > 30% and pro- longed warm/cold ischemia time are positively predictive of SFSS. Donor related factors include deranged liver function tests and prolonged intensive care unit stay greater than five days. Child-Pugh grade C recipients are at relatively greater risk of developing SFSS. Surgi- cal approaches to prevent SFSS fall into two categories: those targeting portal hyperperfusion by reducing inflow to the graft, including splenic artery modulation and portacaval shunts; and those aiming to relieve paren-chymal congestion. This review aims to examine thecontroversial diagnosis of SFSS, including current strate-gies to predict and prevent its occurrence. We will also consider whether such interventions could jeopardize the graft by compromising regeneration.