Is the European Convention going to be 'supreme'? A comparative-constitutional overview of ECHR and EU law before national courts
Treatment of the European Convention on Human Rights and European Union (EU) Law by domestic national judges - impact on constitutional provisions - consistent interpretation - disapplication of national law conflicting with European provisions - emergence of a counter-limits doctrine.
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of international law Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 401 - 424 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
01-05-2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Treatment of the European Convention on Human Rights and European Union (EU) Law by domestic national judges - impact on constitutional provisions - consistent interpretation - disapplication of national law conflicting with European provisions - emergence of a counter-limits doctrine. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Treatment of the European Convention on Human Rights and European Union (EU) Law by domestic national judges - impact on constitutional provisions - consistent interpretation - disapplication of national law conflicting with European provisions - emergence of a counter-limits doctrine. The aim of this article is to answer the question, 'are national judges extending the structural EU law principles (primacy and direct effect) to the European Convention on Human Rights'? This article does not intend to examine the broader issue of the rapprochement between the legal systems of the EU and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) but it concentrates on how national judges treat the norms of the ECHR compared with their treatment of EU law. I have structured this article in three parts. The first part offers a first look at the 'constitutional variety' existing in terms of constitutional provisions devoted to the impact of the ECHR and EU laws on the national systems. In the second part I will move to analyse the relevant case law of the domestic judges on three factors of potential convergence: consistent interpretation, disapplication of national law conflicting with European provisions, and emergence of a counter-limits doctrine. Finally, in the third part I will offer some concluding remarks on the convergence issue. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] The aim of this article is to answer the question, 'are national judges extending the structural EU law principles (primacy and direct effect) to the European Convention on Human Rights'? This article does not intend to examine the broader issue of the rapprochement between the legal systems of the EU and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) but it concentrates on how national judges treat the norms of the ECHR compared with their treatment of EU law. I have structured this article in three parts. The first part offers a first look at the 'constitutional variety' existing in terms of constitutional provisions devoted to the impact of the ECHR and EU laws on the national systems. In the second part I will move to analyse the relevant case law of the domestic judges on three factors of potential convergence: consistent interpretation, disapplication of national law conflicting with European provisions, and emergence of a counter-limits doctrine. Finally, in the third part I will offer some concluding remarks on the convergence issue. Adapted from the source document. |
Author | Giuseppe MARTINICO |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: G. surname: Martinico fullname: Martinico, G. |
BookMark | eNpd0UFrHCEYBmApKXST9tQ_IPSQQplGx9HRUwnLpgkECqU5i-N8s-syo1N1NuTYf16HTS89iIfv8eXD9xJd-OABoY-UfKVEsRs4uvHGHhKp2zdoQxvRVIwrcYE2ZSor3tTyHbpM6UgIEYTXG_TnIeF8ALxbYpjBeLwN_gQ-u-DxPji_xzngDvB1WuYIE1x_w7fYhmk20WR3gsoGn7LLy_rCjDicIJ4cPOMw4N32_ic2vse7Jzya5xIzhAjYm1drwxJzeo_eDmZM8OH1vkJPd7tf2_vq8cf3h-3tY2UbynPVgZSdZNRKMVigIHhnmlYMgvW1ZIoLToiUjEujWk771nZ121ErlG3l0DPJrtDnc-4cw-8FUtaTSxbG0XgIS9K0aaRSJYAX-uk_eiyrlpWLInXTUKWEKOrLWdkYUoow6Dm6ycSXgvRah17r0Oc6ir476zi5rM3epTnrQ85z0r3JRjtfPmcdhbjXfXBrCGNU_KM1oTWry_kLcL2ZrQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1556_2052_2021_00331 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2270565 crossref_primary_10_4018_jte_2013070102 crossref_primary_10_3917_rcdip_134_1065 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0020589313000249 crossref_primary_10_3280_GDL2014_142005 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) May 2012 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) May 2012 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7UB C18 K7. |
DOI | 10.1093/ejil/chs027 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Worldwide Political Science Abstracts Humanities Index ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni) British Humanities Index (BHI) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Law |
EISSN | 1464-3596 |
EndPage | 424 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2707701481 10_1093_ejil_chs027 10.3316/agispt.20123212 |
Genre | Journal Article Feature |
GeographicLocations | EUROPEAN UNION Europe |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: EUROPEAN UNION – name: Europe |
GroupedDBID | -E4 -~X .2P .CB .FK .I3 0R~ 0ZK 18M 1TH 2-G 29G 3R3 4.4 48X 5.J 5GY 5VS 5WA 6DY 70D 96U AACLI AAFWJ AAFXQ AAJKP AAJQQ AAMVS AAMZS AAOGV AAPQZ AAPXW AAQJL AARHZ AARQT AASKQ AAUAY AAUIV AAUOS AAVAP ABACO ABCLM ABDBF ABFRF ABGTT ABIXL ABJFX ABJNI ABKEB ABLJU ABNKS ABPTD ABQLI ABQTQ ABSAR ABTXH ABVAB ABWST ABXVV ABYLZ ABZBJ ABZQA ACBMB ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACUFI ACVHY ADBKU ADCHZ ADEYI ADEYR ADEZT ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIMT ADIPN ADLOL ADMVX ADOCK ADQBN ADQIT ADRIX ADUOI ADYVW ADZXQ AEDZA AEFWE AEFZC AEGPL AEGXH AEGZQ AEHKA AEJOX AEKSI AEMDU AENZO AEPUE AEWNT AFACB AFAZI AFFZL AFHLB AFIYH AFOFC AFVIK AFXEN AFZTK AGINJ AGKEF AGPAQ AGQXC AGSYK AHEHV AHLMI AHXPO AIAGR AIJHB AIMRU AIXTP AJOFM ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC APWMN ASBRX ATGXG AYLYT BAWVD BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHRNT BHZBG BSEYZ BWUDY CNZYI COF CS3 CZ4 DAKXR DU5 D~K E3Z EBS EE~ EJD ESX ETYVG EV9 F8P F9B FALNP FLUFQ FM. FOEOM FQBLK FRP FRS FTKQU GCT GJXCC H13 H5~ HAR HISYW HLR HOCAJ HW0 HZ~ IOX J21 KBUDW KOP KQ8 KSI KSN LAAQE LBA LBL LDNZT LFVXT LKZDS LNAJO LXB LXL LXN LXO LXU LXY M-Z M49 MJWOD N9A NANYC NGC NOMLY NPJNY NU- NXXTH O0~ O9- OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OXVUA P2P PEELM PLIXB PQQKQ Q.- Q1. Q5Y RCI RD5 RHO ROL ROX ROZ RW1 RXO RXW TAA TAC TAE TAF TJJ TJL TLA TQW TR2 TWJ UFL ULB UNMZH UVLOZ UXK UXL UXR VKN W2G W8F WE1 WJGAX X6Y X7H XFL XPU YADRA YAJVU YKOAZ YXANX ZKX ZRF ZRR ZYG ~02 ~91 ~D7 ~SN ~ZZ AAYXX ABEJV CITATION 7UB C18 K7. |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-be88b831c86fce1e65ba476f63d28395650088358a9751d7cb27b1c69c78fd383 |
ISSN | 0938-5428 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 09:09:16 EDT 2024 Wed Nov 06 07:38:55 EST 2024 Thu Nov 21 23:50:27 EST 2024 Wed Aug 28 03:34:44 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c415t-be88b831c86fce1e65ba476f63d28395650088358a9751d7cb27b1c69c78fd383 |
Notes | European Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2012: 401-424 EuroJInterLaw.jpg 2012-08-09T11:07:40+10:00 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1024419966 |
PQPubID | 32381 |
PageCount | 24 |
ParticipantIDs | rmit_agispt_https_data_informit_org_doi_10_3316_agispt_20123212 proquest_journals_1024419966 proquest_miscellaneous_1448993585 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejil_chs027 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2012 text: 2012-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | European journal of international law |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
SSID | ssj0006052 |
Score | 2.1783998 |
Snippet | Treatment of the European Convention on Human Rights and European Union (EU) Law by domestic national judges - impact on constitutional provisions - consistent... The aim of this article is to answer the question, 'are national judges extending the structural EU law principles (primacy and direct effect) to the European... |
SourceID | proquest crossref rmit |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 401 |
SubjectTerms | COMPARATIVE LAW Congresses and Conventions COURTS European Union Human Rights International Law Judges Judges & magistrates Law LEGAL SYSTEM Provisions Rapprochement Studies Treaties |
Title | Is the European Convention going to be 'supreme'? A comparative-constitutional overview of ECHR and EU law before national courts |
URI | https://search.informit.org/documentSummary;res=agispt;dn=20123212 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1024419966 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1448993585 |
Volume | 23 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Na9swFBdLd9ll7JNl64YGHT0E00qWbflU2sxZCiWBNoHehCXLXceITR3vvv98T5Jlp2yD7rCLcWxFNvo9nn_vUwgdUKq5zvMkKCMaBQwobJCC9RPQhERKJlTq3ER051fJ4pp_zlg25M8P1_4r0nANsDaVs_-Adj8pXIBzwByOgDocH4T7eWO5ZO9ln_Zp5ZMvla2NqiZnhlgmV21tnINw9imc2fL0vhF4YPbxtEkEzlO4_GFUiitxyabzSxtyyNY2uiA18F49WXivotkFz7WH-qPHf6dNxeCJ_D640l1fA5BP67G_bRtd13rXN2GSPHwmoHcygjqNWFf-3elbV1_cyRXdUZ6s-6v7DjNXW_2binftr_Q34yKfqa_NsestcL-V9mIpZuuLC7HKrlcj9JiCFjIbK1zOl_1nGuw4G2Lyr9gVb8LvIzP5kZv6Pl0ZbJCddguWiayeoaedCYFPHfbP0SO9eYFGAMVL9PO8wYA-9iuOB_SxRR9vK3ym8WGH_eEJPsV_xx173HFVYoM7BtxxtsbwMOxwxx537HB_hdazbDWdB90mG4EC7rYNpOZc8pAoHpdKEx1HMmdJXMZhAcwTrOcIWCLQdJ6nSUSKREmaSKLiVCW8LEIevkZ7m2qj3yCsSgX2LymIPE4ZjE4LSVlZUpmHhcoJHaMDv5aidr1UhMuBCIVZcuGWfIz2_TqLTi4bGAQ81GTMx2P0sb8NqtDEt_KNrloYwxhPTVw_GqMTg4_Ib26bemtL1xphUq6Fa0cMt6q7GwEiZV4gDEnsh1JrYxD69gFPeYeeDEK_j_a2d61-j0ZN0X6wovYLBRWXKQ |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,27934,27935 |
linkProvider | William S. Hein & Co., Inc. |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is+the+European+Convention+Going+to+Be+%27Supreme%27%3F+A+Comparative-Constitutional+Overview+of+ECHR+and+EU+Law+before+National+Courts&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+international+law&rft.au=Martinico%2C+Giuseppe&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.issn=0938-5428&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fejil%2Fchs027&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0938-5428&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0938-5428&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0938-5428&client=summon |