Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Introduction Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), but pancreatic operations carry a significant morbidity. We investigated whether the resection of small, asymptomatic nonfunctioning PNETs is beneficial. Clinicopathologic factors were retros...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 277 - 283 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Springer US
01-02-2016
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Introduction
Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), but pancreatic operations carry a significant morbidity. We investigated whether the resection of small, asymptomatic nonfunctioning PNETs is beneficial. Clinicopathologic factors were retrospectively reviewed for all PNET cases from 1998 to 2014.
Methods
Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariable regression analyses were performed. A total of 249 patients had nonfunctioning PNETs with adequate follow-up, of whom 193 were resected and 56 were observed. Median age was 56 years, and 48 % of the patients were female.
Results
Overall, the resected patients had a significantly longer survival (OS) (
p
= 0.001). However, for the patients with PNETs ≤2.5 cm in size and without metastasis at presentation, tumor size significantly modified the effect of resection on overall survival (
p
< 0.05). The protective effect of resection increased as tumor size increased. An operation became a significant predictor of overall survival for tumors >1.5 cm (
p
= 0.050 or less for larger tumors) but was not significant for tumors <1.5 cm (
p
= 0.317 or more for smaller tumors), controlling for age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index.
Conclusion
Resection of nonfunctioning PNETs over 1.5 cm is independently and significantly associated with a longer survival. However, the benefit of resection for tumors under 1.5 cm is unclear. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11605-015-3043-5 |