Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm

• Published in: Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology Vol. 10; p. 574028
• Main Authors: Roisin, Lolita, Melloul, Elise, Woerther, Paul-Louis, Royer, Guilhem, Decousser, Jean-Winoc, Guillot, Jacques, Dannaoui, Eric, Botterel, Françoise
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers 06-10-2020; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: antibacterial agent; antifungal agent; antimicrobial susceptibility; Aspergillus fumigatus; Cellular and Infection Microbiology; Life Sciences; polymicrobial biofilm; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; antimicrobial susceptibility; antibacterial agent; antifungal agent; polymicrobial biofilm; Aspergillus fumigatus
• ISSN: 2235-2988; 2235-2988
• DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.574028

The complexity of biofilms constitutes a therapeutic challenge and the antimicrobial susceptibility of fungal-bacterial biofilms remains poorly studied. The filamentous fungus
(Af) and the Gram-negative bacillus
(Sm) can form biofilms and can be co-isolated from the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We previously developed an
biofilm model which highlighted the antibiosis effect of Sm on Af, which was dependent on the bacterial fitness. The aim of the present study was to investigate the
susceptibility of Af and Sm in mono- or polymicrobial biofilms to five antimicrobial agents alone and in two-drug combinations.
Af and Sm clinical reference strains and two strains from CF sputa were tested through a planktonic and biofilm approaches. Af, Sm, or Af-Sm susceptibilities to amphotericin B (AMB), itraconazole (ITC), voriconazole (VRC), levofloxacin (LVX), and rifampicin (RFN) were evaluated by conventional planktonic techniques, crystal violet, XTT, qPCR, and viable plate count.
Af planktonic cells and biofilms in formation were more susceptible to AMB, ITC, and VRC than Af mature biofilms. Af mature biofilms were susceptible to AMB, but not to ITC and VRC. Based on viable plate count, a lower concentration of LVX and RFN was required to reduce Sm cell numbers on biofilms in formation compared with mature biofilms. The antibiosis effect of Sm on Af growth was more pronounced for the association of CF strains that exhibited a higher fitness than the reference strains. In Af-Sm biofilms, the fungal susceptibility to AMB was increased compared with Af biofilms. In contrast, the bacterial susceptibility to LVX decreased in Af-Sm biofilms and was fungal biomass-dependent. The combination of AMB (64 μg/mL) with LVX or RFN (4 μg/mL) was efficient to impair Af and Sm growth in the polymicrobial biofilm.
Sm increased the Af susceptibility to AMB, whereas Af protected Sm from LVX. Interactions between Af and Sm within biofilms modulate susceptibility to antimicrobial agents, opening the way to new antimicrobial strategies in CF patients.