Integrating a Next Generation Sequencing Panel into Clinical Practice in Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSEFew efforts have been made to integrate a next generation sequencing (NGS) panel into standard clinical treatment of ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of NGS and to identify clinically impactful information beyond targetable alterations. MATERIALS A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Yonsei medical journal Vol. 60; no. 10; pp. 914 - 923
Main Authors: Lee, Yong Jae, Kim, Dachan, Kim, Hyun-Soo, Lee, Jung-Yun, Nam, Eun Ji, Kim, Sang Wun, Kim, Sunghoon, Kim, Young Tae
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Yonsei University College of Medicine 01-10-2019
연세대학교의과대학
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PURPOSEFew efforts have been made to integrate a next generation sequencing (NGS) panel into standard clinical treatment of ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of NGS and to identify clinically impactful information beyond targetable alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a retrospective review of 84 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent NGS between March 1, 2017, and July 31, 2018, at the Yonsei Cancer Hospital. We extracted DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of ovarian cancer. The TruSight Tumor 170 gene panel was used to prepare libraries, and the MiSeq instrument was used for NGS. RESULTSOf the 84 patients, 55 (65.1%) had high-grade serous carcinomas. Seventy-three (86.7%) patients underwent NGS at the time of diagnosis, and 11 (13.3%) underwent NGS upon relapse. The most common genetic alterations were in TP53 (64%), PIK3CA (15%), and BRCA1/2 (13%), arising as single nucleotide variants and indels. MYC amplification (27%) was the most common copy number variation and fusion. Fifty-seven (67.9%) patients had more than one actionable alteration other than TP53. Seven (8.3%) cases received matched-target therapy based on the following sequencing results: BRCA1 or 2 mutation, poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (n=5); PIK3CA mutation, AKT inhibitor (n=1); and MLH1 mutation, PD-1 inhibitor (n=1). Fifty-three (63.0%) patients had a possibility of treatment change, and 8 (9.5%) patients received genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONImplementation of NGS may help in identifying patients who might benefit from targeted treatment therapies and genetic counseling.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
https://www.eymj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3349/ymj.2019.60.10.914
ISSN:0513-5796
1976-2437
DOI:10.3349/ymj.2019.60.10.914