Widening the applicability of AnMBR for urban wastewater treatment through PDMS membranes for dissolved methane capture: Effect of temperature and hydrodynamics

• Published in: Journal of environmental management Vol. 287; p. 112344
• Main Authors: Sanchis-Perucho, Pau, Robles, Ángel, Durán, Freddy, Rogalla, Frank, Ferrer, José, Seco, Aurora
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-06-2021
• Subjects: Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR); Anaerobiosis; Bioreactors; Dimethylpolysiloxanes; Dissolved methane capture; Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; Hydrodynamics; Membranes, Artificial; Methane; PDMS degassing Membrane; Temperature; Urban wastewater; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Waste Water - analysis; Water Purification; Urban wastewater; Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR); PDMS degassing Membrane; Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; Dissolved methane capture
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112344

AnMBR technology is a promising alternative to achieve future energy-efficiency and environmental-friendly urban wastewater (UWW) treatment. However, the large amount of dissolved methane lost in the effluent represents a potential high environmental impact that hinder the feasibility of this technology for full-scale applications. The use of degassing membranes (DM) to capture the dissolved methane from AnMBR effluents can be considered as an interesting alternative to solve this problem although further research is required to assess the suitability of this emerging technology. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of operating temperature and hydrodynamics on the capture of dissolved methane from AnMBR effluents by DMs. To this aim, a commercial polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) DM was coupled to an industrial prototype AnMBR (demonstration scale) treating UWW at ambient temperature. Different operating temperatures have been evaluated: 11, 18, 24 and 30 °C. Moreover, the DM was operated at different ratios of liquid flow rate to membrane area (QL:A) ranging from 22 to 190 Lh−1m−2 in order to study the resistance of the system to methane permeation. Methane recovery was maximized when temperature raised and QL:A was reduced, giving methane recovery efficiencies (MRE) of about 85% at a temperature of 30 °C and a QL:A of 25 Lh−1m−2. The study showed that high QL:A ratios hinder methane recovery by the perturbation of the DM fibers, being this effect intensified at lower temperatures probably due the higher liquid viscosities. Also, the performed fouling evaluation showed that not significant membrane fouling may be expected in the DM unit at the short-term when treating AnMBR effluents. A resistance-in-series model was proposed to predict the overall mass transfer of the system according to operating temperature and QL:A, showing that methane capture was controlled by the liquid phase, which represented up to 80–90% of total mass transfer resistance. The energy and environmental evaluation performed in this study revealed that PDMS DMs would enhance energy recovery and environmental feasibility of AnMBR technology for UWW treatment, especially when operating at low temperatures. When MRE was maximized, the combination of AnMBR with DM achieved net energy productions and net greenhouse gas reductions of up to 0.87 kWh and 0.216 kg CO2–eq per m3 of treated water.
•Dissolved methane can be captured by PDMS membranes even at low temperatures.•The membrane's methane capture resistance is mainly controlled by the liquid phase.•A resistance-in-series model is proposed to predict the membrane's resistance.•Energy and environmental impacts of sewage treatment can be reduced by this system.