Otolith size and location in digestive tracts of northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus): Implications for dietary interpretations

Walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) otoliths (n= 2,706) recovered from stomachs, small intestines, and colons of 43 northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) were evaluated for size and wear by location in the digestive tract. Pollock fork length was regressed on otolith length after correction f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine mammal science Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 421 - 430
Main Authors: Sinclair, E. H., York, A. E., Antonelis, G. A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01-04-2011
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) otoliths (n= 2,706) recovered from stomachs, small intestines, and colons of 43 northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) were evaluated for size and wear by location in the digestive tract. Pollock fork length was regressed on otolith length after correction for erosion, and age was estimated from the calculated body size. Age‐1+ pollock otoliths (≥6.3‐mm length) were concentrated in stomachs while age‐0 otoliths (≤6.2‐mm length) were concentrated in colons. Less than 10% of otoliths were found in the small intestines. Pollock age decreased with progression along seal gastrointestinal tracts. Otolith quality increased along gastrointestinal tracts in numbers ≥20, which was typical of age‐0 otoliths recovered from colons. Otolith distribution by age and quality along gastrointestinal tracts suggests that small (≤12 cm) schooling prey are consumed in large volume and passed as a bolus rapidly through the digestive tract before significant erosion of bony remains occurs; while larger prey are eaten in smaller volume and subjected to otolith erosion due to longer retention in the stomach. Our results illustrate the importance of multiple sampling strategies to comprehensively represent prey size in pinniped diet.
Bibliography:ArticleID:MMS418
ark:/67375/WNG-GZCF6JGM-T
istex:5B3BC43E8540FE5450EACAFA993DBCAC11109149
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0824-0469
1748-7692
DOI:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00418.x