Development of a grain growth model for U3Si2 using experimental data, phase field simulation and molecular dynamics
The purpose of this work is to develop a model for normal grain growth in U3Si2. The average grain boundary energy was determined from previously published molecular dynamics simulations. The grain growth kinetics were quantified at various temperatures by annealing nanocrystalline samples. The mobi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of nuclear materials Vol. 532; no. C; p. 152069 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
15-04-2020
Elsevier BV Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The purpose of this work is to develop a model for normal grain growth in U3Si2. The average grain boundary energy was determined from previously published molecular dynamics simulations. The grain growth kinetics were quantified at various temperatures by annealing nanocrystalline samples. The mobility was determined by comparing phase field grain growth simulations to the experimental data. From these various methods, we found that the average grain size D in U3Si2 can be estimated over time t using the equation D2−D02=2αMγt, where D0 is the initial average grain size, the geometry factor α=0.96, the average grain boundary mobility M=6.30×10−18e−0.33[eV]kbTm4/(Js) with the Boltzmann constant kb and temperature T, and the average grain boundary energy has been found as a function of temperature, e.g. γ¯=0.83 J/m2 at 673 K.
•The grain growth constant and activation energy were obtained from isothermal annealing experiments on U3Si2 lamellae.•The grain growth geometric constant was calculated using several 3D phase field grain growth simulations.•The grain boundary mobility was determined from experimental data, grain boundary energy, and phase field simulations.•More grain growth occurs in U3Si2 than in UO2 at 1200 K.•Grain growth is more rapid in UO2 than in U3Si2 at their respective centerline temperatures. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 16–10667; 19–1691; AC07-051D14517 USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) |
ISSN: | 0022-3115 1873-4820 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152069 |