Comparing the burden of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy

Background Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgery Vol. 159; no. 4; pp. 1013 - 1022
Main Authors: McMillan, Matthew T., BA, Christein, John D., MD, Callery, Mark P., MD, Behrman, Stephen W., MD, Drebin, Jeffrey A., MD, PhD, Hollis, Robert H., MD, Kent, Tara S., MD, Miller, Benjamin C., BA, Sprys, Michael H., MS, Watkins, Ammara A., MD, Strasberg, Steven M., MD, Vollmer, Charles M., MD
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-04-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden. Methods From 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP. Results POPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P  < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P  < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P  < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P  < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P  < .05). Conclusion Although POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications.
AbstractList Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden. From 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP. POPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P < .05). Although POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications.
BACKGROUNDDifferences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden.METHODSFrom 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP.RESULTSPOPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P < .05).CONCLUSIONAlthough POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications.
Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden. From 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP. POPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P < .05). Although POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications.
Background Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden. Methods From 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP. Results POPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P  < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P  < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P  < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P  < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P  < .05). Conclusion Although POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications.
Author Christein, John D., MD
Callery, Mark P., MD
Behrman, Stephen W., MD
Miller, Benjamin C., BA
McMillan, Matthew T., BA
Sprys, Michael H., MS
Vollmer, Charles M., MD
Kent, Tara S., MD
Strasberg, Steven M., MD
Drebin, Jeffrey A., MD, PhD
Watkins, Ammara A., MD
Hollis, Robert H., MD
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: McMillan, Matthew T., BA
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Christein, John D., MD
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Callery, Mark P., MD
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Behrman, Stephen W., MD
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Drebin, Jeffrey A., MD, PhD
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Hollis, Robert H., MD
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Kent, Tara S., MD
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Miller, Benjamin C., BA
– sequence: 9
  fullname: Sprys, Michael H., MS
– sequence: 10
  fullname: Watkins, Ammara A., MD
– sequence: 11
  fullname: Strasberg, Steven M., MD
– sequence: 12
  fullname: Vollmer, Charles M., MD
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26670325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVJaDZp_0AOxcdcvB1JtmRDKIQl_YBAD2nPQpbGiba2tJXswP77yGyyhxxyErzzzAt65pyc-OCRkEsKawpUfN2u0xwf1gxonYM1sOYDWdGas1JyQU_ICoC3pQABZ-Q8pS0AtBVtPpIzJoQEzuoV0Zsw7nR0_qGYHrHo5mjRF6EvdtqbiHpypuhdmuZBp0L3E8bjJNg5ZBjNFMZ9ob0tbAb1cAQOk0_ktNdDws8v7wX5-_32z-Zneff7x6_NzV1pKkqn0nCkBitpK9ExrBoJWiPHFrATdU56AQ2zRjLb0R6Qdm2L0jDLTF-h0IxfkKtD7y6G_zOmSY0uGRwG7THMSVEpWcO5bNuMsgNqYkgpYq920Y067hUFtahVW7WoVYvaJctq89KXl_65G9EeV15dZuD6AGD-5ZPDqJJx6A1aF7MKZYN7v__bm3UzOO-MHv7hHtM2zNFnf4qqxBSo--W4y21pnc8KdcOfARSZo-s
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_016_3289_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2017_1417474
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_018_3959_7
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_14554_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msec_2019_109786
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_890518
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_03_007
crossref_primary_10_1038_s43856_022_00087_7
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002673
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_843
crossref_primary_10_1111_iwj_14755
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_016_0336_5
crossref_primary_10_1177_14574969231167781
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2019_09_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2020_10_043
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_020_05823_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000003205
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_17673
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2024_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_016_5762_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2018_07_024
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10585_020_10029_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2020_03_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2018_11_012
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_022_02128_w
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_017_0810_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2023_05_007
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_934
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11247516
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2016_05_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2020_09_008
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000001892
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_03_044
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_07_026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2017_10_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_04_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2020_07_056
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2019_2272
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004921
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_016_3286_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPA_0000000000001454
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPA_0000000000002023
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000006060
crossref_primary_10_2147_TCRM_S361332
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_023_03053_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002532
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002375
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_023_07175_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_017_3564_1
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_017_6281_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2021_05_007
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2019_6020
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_017_3547_2
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1765_4402
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0205748
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v30_i10_1329
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2020_11_022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2019_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_02_064
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2021_12_017
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_022_09830_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_021_08611_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002327
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_09251_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04155_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2019_09_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2022_07_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2023_09_007
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_022_01650_8
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004068
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002491
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_838
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2022_11_030
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004549
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2023_12_050
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2019_02_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2019_02_016
crossref_primary_10_1093_bjsopen_zrae059
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_022_06736_5
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.023
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.019
10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00074.x
10.1002/bjs.5000
10.1007/s00534-005-0990-3
10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.011
10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.013
10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
10.1001/archsurg.2010.118
10.1007/s11605-007-0180-5
10.1007/s00534-008-1332-z
10.1007/s00423-014-1220-8
10.1016/j.gassur.2005.01.287
10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00790-0
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.036
10.1097/00000658-199502000-00006
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000843
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.004
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.064
10.1111/hpb.12293
10.1111/hpb.12131
10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030065013
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Elsevier Inc.
2016 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: 2016 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1532-7361
EndPage 1022
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_surg_2015_10_028
26670325
S0039606015009058
1_s2_0_S0039606015009058
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.XZ
.~1
0R~
0SF
123
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~.
1~5
354
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8F7
8P~
AABNK
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXKI
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABCQX
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACRLP
ACWUS
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFKWA
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJOXV
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FD6
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
K-O
KOM
L7B
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OBH
OHH
OJ0
OV0
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TEORI
UDS
UGJ
UHS
UQV
UQZ
UV1
VVN
WH7
X7M
YOC
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
~G-
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AHPSJ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
ZA5
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c3e1ce47d46b2e4870aae3e90eb65b2ef6082dc72db1f0e1b99e7c2d2cf4e6a23
ISSN 0039-6060
IngestDate Sat Oct 05 05:05:12 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 19:02:18 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:58:10 EDT 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:24:43 EST 2024
Tue Oct 15 22:56:07 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c411t-c3e1ce47d46b2e4870aae3e90eb65b2ef6082dc72db1f0e1b99e7c2d2cf4e6a23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-0519-2577
0000-0001-5874-406X
PMID 26670325
PQID 1772833799
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1772833799
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2015_10_028
pubmed_primary_26670325
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_surg_2015_10_028
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0039606015009058
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Surgery
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Clavien, Sanabria, Strasberg (bib8) 1992; 111
Miller, Christein, Behrman, Callery, Drebin, Kent (bib7) 2013; 15
McMillan, Vollmer, Asbun, Ball, Bassi, Beane (bib23) 2015
Pratt, Maithel, Vanounou, Callery, Vollmer (bib2) 2006; 10
Sanford, Woolsey, Hall, Linehan, Hawkins, Fields (bib24) 2014; 219
Schmidt, Turrini, Parikh, House, Zyromski, Nakeeb (bib11) 2010; 145
Vollmer, Lewis, Hall, Allendorf, Beane, Behrman (bib5) 2015; 261
Truty, Sawyer, Que (bib19) 2007; 11
Fernandez-del Castillo, Rattner, Warshaw (bib1) 1995; 130
McMillan, Vollmer (bib22) 2014; 399
Lee, Lewis, Strasberg, Hall, Allendorf, Beane (bib6) 2014; 16
Fahy, Frey, Ho, Beckett, Bold (bib14) 2002; 183
Hashimoto (bib10) 2012
Porembka, Hall, Hirbe, Strasberg (bib3) 2010; 210
Strasberg, Hall (bib4) 2011; 213
Kuroki, Tajima, Kanematsu (bib16) 2005; 12
Bassi, Dervenis, Butturini, Fingerhut, Yeo, Izbicki (bib9) 2005; 138
Knaebel, Diener, Wente, Buchler, Seiler (bib13) 2005; 92
Kitagawa, Ohta, Tani, Tajima, Nakagawara, Ohnishi (bib20) 2008; 15
Konishi, Hiraishi, Kubota, Bandai, Makuuchi, Idezuki (bib17) 1995; 221
Balzano, Zerbi, Cristallo, Di Carlo (bib15) 2005; 9
Abe, Sugiyama, Suzuki, Yamaguchi, Yanagida, Masaki (bib18) 2006; 191
Pitt, Kilbane, Strasberg, Pawlik, Dixon, Zyromski (bib25) 2009; 11
Tseng, Pisters, Lee, Wang, Gomez, Sun (bib12) 2007; 141
Sudo, Murakami, Uemura, Hayashidani, Hashimoto, Nakashima (bib21) 2011; 202
Lee (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib6) 2014; 16
Porembka (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib3) 2010; 210
Clavien (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib8) 1992; 111
McMillan (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib23) 2015
Strasberg (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib4) 2011; 213
Vollmer (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib5) 2015; 261
Abe (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib18) 2006; 191
Sudo (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib21) 2011; 202
Schmidt (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib11) 2010; 145
Tseng (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib12) 2007; 141
Kitagawa (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib20) 2008; 15
Knaebel (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib13) 2005; 92
Pratt (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib2) 2006; 10
Kuroki (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib16) 2005; 12
Hashimoto (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib10) 2012
Sanford (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib24) 2014; 219
Truty (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib19) 2007; 11
Konishi (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib17) 1995; 221
Miller (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib7) 2013; 15
Fernandez-del Castillo (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib1) 1995; 130
Pitt (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib25) 2009; 11
Fahy (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib14) 2002; 183
Balzano (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib15) 2005; 9
McMillan (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib22) 2014; 399
Bassi (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib9) 2005; 138
References_xml – volume: 145
  start-page: 634
  year: 2010
  end-page: 640
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience
  publication-title: Arch Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Nakeeb
– volume: 202
  start-page: 77
  year: 2011
  end-page: 81
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Distal pancreatectomy with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy: a novel technique for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Nakashima
– year: 2012
  ident: bib10
  article-title: The Pancreas Club ISGPS calculator
  contributor:
    fullname: Hashimoto
– volume: 11
  start-page: 405
  year: 2009
  end-page: 413
  ident: bib25
  article-title: ACS-NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB-NSQIP option
  publication-title: HPB
  contributor:
    fullname: Zyromski
– volume: 141
  start-page: 456
  year: 2007
  end-page: 463
  ident: bib12
  article-title: The learning curve in pancreatic surgery
  publication-title: Surgery
  contributor:
    fullname: Sun
– volume: 183
  start-page: 237
  year: 2002
  end-page: 241
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Bold
– volume: 111
  start-page: 518
  year: 1992
  end-page: 526
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy
  publication-title: Surgery
  contributor:
    fullname: Strasberg
– volume: 92
  start-page: 539
  year: 2005
  end-page: 546
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Seiler
– volume: 261
  start-page: 527
  year: 2015
  end-page: 536
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Behrman
– volume: 11
  start-page: 998
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1007
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Que
– volume: 15
  start-page: 781
  year: 2013
  end-page: 788
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Assessing the impact of a fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy using the Post-operative Morbidity Index
  publication-title: HPB
  contributor:
    fullname: Kent
– volume: 219
  start-page: 407
  year: 2014
  end-page: 415
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Variations in definition and method of retrieval of complications influence outcomes statistics after pancreatoduodenectomy: comparison of NSQIP with non-NSQIP methods
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Fields
– volume: 399
  start-page: 811
  year: 2014
  end-page: 824
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Langenbeck Arch Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Vollmer
– volume: 191
  start-page: 198
  year: 2006
  end-page: 200
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting for prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula development after distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Masaki
– volume: 221
  start-page: 165
  year: 1995
  end-page: 170
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Segmental occlusion of the pancreatic duct with prolamine to prevent fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Idezuki
– volume: 210
  start-page: 286
  year: 2010
  end-page: 298
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Strasberg
– volume: 12
  start-page: 283
  year: 2005
  end-page: 285
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Kanematsu
– volume: 9
  start-page: 837
  year: 2005
  end-page: 842
  ident: bib15
  article-title: The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy: the benefit of cautious drain management
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Di Carlo
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1264
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1278
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Vollmer
– volume: 130
  start-page: 295
  year: 1995
  end-page: 299
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s
  publication-title: Arch Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Warshaw
– year: 2015
  ident: bib23
  article-title: The characterization and prediction of ISGPF grade c fistulas following pancreatoduodenectomy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Beane
– volume: 15
  start-page: 377
  year: 2008
  end-page: 383
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Nonclosure technique with saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery in management of the cut surface after distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Ohnishi
– volume: 16
  start-page: 915
  year: 2014
  end-page: 923
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Defining the post-operative morbidity index for distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: HPB
  contributor:
    fullname: Beane
– volume: 213
  start-page: 616
  year: 2011
  end-page: 626
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Hall
– volume: 138
  start-page: 8
  year: 2005
  end-page: 13
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition
  publication-title: Surgery
  contributor:
    fullname: Izbicki
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib10
  contributor:
    fullname: Hashimoto
– volume: 202
  start-page: 77
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib21
  article-title: Distal pancreatectomy with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy: a novel technique for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.023
  contributor:
    fullname: Sudo
– volume: 213
  start-page: 616
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib4
  article-title: Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.019
  contributor:
    fullname: Strasberg
– volume: 11
  start-page: 405
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib25
  article-title: ACS-NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB-NSQIP option
  publication-title: HPB
  doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00074.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Pitt
– volume: 92
  start-page: 539
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib13
  article-title: Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.5000
  contributor:
    fullname: Knaebel
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib23
  article-title: The characterization and prediction of ISGPF grade c fistulas following pancreatoduodenectomy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: McMillan
– volume: 12
  start-page: 283
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib16
  article-title: Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00534-005-0990-3
  contributor:
    fullname: Kuroki
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1264
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib2
  article-title: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.011
  contributor:
    fullname: Pratt
– volume: 141
  start-page: 456
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib12
  article-title: The learning curve in pancreatic surgery
  publication-title: Surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.013
  contributor:
    fullname: Tseng
– volume: 138
  start-page: 8
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib9
  article-title: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition
  publication-title: Surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
  contributor:
    fullname: Bassi
– volume: 111
  start-page: 518
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib8
  article-title: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy
  publication-title: Surgery
  contributor:
    fullname: Clavien
– volume: 145
  start-page: 634
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib11
  article-title: Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience
  publication-title: Arch Surg
  doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.118
  contributor:
    fullname: Schmidt
– volume: 11
  start-page: 998
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib19
  article-title: Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0180-5
  contributor:
    fullname: Truty
– volume: 15
  start-page: 377
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib20
  article-title: Nonclosure technique with saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery in management of the cut surface after distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00534-008-1332-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Kitagawa
– volume: 399
  start-page: 811
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib22
  article-title: Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Langenbeck Arch Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1220-8
  contributor:
    fullname: McMillan
– volume: 9
  start-page: 837
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib15
  article-title: The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy: the benefit of cautious drain management
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.01.287
  contributor:
    fullname: Balzano
– volume: 183
  start-page: 237
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib14
  article-title: Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00790-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Fahy
– volume: 191
  start-page: 198
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib18
  article-title: Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting for prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula development after distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.036
  contributor:
    fullname: Abe
– volume: 221
  start-page: 165
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib17
  article-title: Segmental occlusion of the pancreatic duct with prolamine to prevent fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199502000-00006
  contributor:
    fullname: Konishi
– volume: 261
  start-page: 527
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib5
  article-title: Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000843
  contributor:
    fullname: Vollmer
– volume: 210
  start-page: 286
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib3
  article-title: Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.004
  contributor:
    fullname: Porembka
– volume: 219
  start-page: 407
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib24
  article-title: Variations in definition and method of retrieval of complications influence outcomes statistics after pancreatoduodenectomy: comparison of NSQIP with non-NSQIP methods
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.064
  contributor:
    fullname: Sanford
– volume: 16
  start-page: 915
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib6
  article-title: Defining the post-operative morbidity index for distal pancreatectomy
  publication-title: HPB
  doi: 10.1111/hpb.12293
  contributor:
    fullname: Lee
– volume: 15
  start-page: 781
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib7
  article-title: Assessing the impact of a fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy using the Post-operative Morbidity Index
  publication-title: HPB
  doi: 10.1111/hpb.12131
  contributor:
    fullname: Miller
– volume: 130
  start-page: 295
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib1
  article-title: Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s
  publication-title: Arch Surg
  doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030065013
  contributor:
    fullname: Fernandez-del Castillo
SSID ssj0009418
Score 2.5331347
Snippet Background Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare...
Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after...
BACKGROUNDDifferences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1013
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Cost of Illness
Databases, Factual
Female
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatectomy - methods
Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology
Pancreatic Fistula - etiology
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Severity of Illness Index
Surgery
Title Comparing the burden of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy
URI https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0039606015009058
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26670325
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1772833799
Volume 159
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwELa6y4ULAvEqsMhI3KJUtuMk9ZHtdrUSAiFaBOJiJX6AVkuDms3_Z_xI-tgtAiQuUWVPE8fzeWY8mfEg9JozS4gpqrRWPEt5aXUqOHcxDTk3FTOgFFw28sWifP9lejbn89GorwC2afuvnIY24LXLnP0Lbg83hQb4DTyHK3Adrn_E91koLBiToGqfpeDDmoG93kBUiQXWdmA1xwLhfU-juwaInRv_RziVSTvj8mogCD3b5uxiK6naO_dcamFwqcZC4slysusOCKcZxBKbPm7nzFO8G0KPZ668S_i67zKJkg97_afm-7r324YYteTzNkn0YdBiK_QlyuVMpLCVIrcK9eBfuARtsv7mgvHyiYvHiznlOydoz2dvadqyCUkX7pbujmDwEkHyPeKw_5Etk0TeID1CdxiILRcg-jX_uDnCmdOg1-NYYwpWiBbcH9shM-fQNsabM8v76F7ch-A3AUAP0MisHqJqAA8G3uEAHtxYvAEP7sGDPXjwreDBAB4cwIN3wfMIfTqfL2cXaazBkSpO6XWqMkOV4aXmRQ0rF6R7VZnMCGLqIocWW4ANqVXJdE0tMbQWwpSKaaYsBxHAssfoeNWszFOEbUXtVBV1WU4Np7oQmomCWWYI6DjQA2OU9FMmf4ajVmQfg3gp3QRLN8GuDSZ4jMp-VmWfRAxqz7RxLbbyEHvHKB_-Gc3MYD5KANxvn_iqZ54EGew-rFUr03TwJNiiTrOsFGKMngSuDm8ABjAoVZY_--fxPkd3N2vmBTq-XnfmBB21unvpAfoLKDyxCw
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27935,27936
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+the+burden+of+pancreatic+fistulas+after+pancreatoduodenectomy+and+distal+pancreatectomy&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=McMillan%2C+Matthew+T.%2C+BA&rft.au=Christein%2C+John+D.%2C+MD&rft.au=Callery%2C+Mark+P.%2C+MD&rft.au=Behrman%2C+Stephen+W.%2C+MD&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.surg.2015.10.028&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0039606015009058&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0039606015009058
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0039-6060&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0039-6060&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0039-6060&client=summon