Comparing the burden of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy
Background Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of co...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surgery Vol. 159; no. 4; pp. 1013 - 1022 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-04-2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Background Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden. Methods From 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP. Results POPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P < .05). Conclusion Although POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden.
From 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP.
POPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P < .05).
Although POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications. BACKGROUNDDifferences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden.METHODSFrom 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP.RESULTSPOPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P < .05).CONCLUSIONAlthough POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications. Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden. From 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP. POPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P < .05). Although POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications. Background Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) using the average complication burden (ACB), a quantitative measure of complication burden. Methods From 2001 to 2014, 837 DPs and 1,533 PDs were performed by 14 surgeons at 4 institutions. POPFs were categorized by International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula standards as biochemical (grade A) or clinically relevant (CR-POPF; grades B and C). ACB values were derived from fistula severity scores based on the Modified Accordion Severity Grading. The ACB of POPFs was compared between PD and DP. Results POPFs were more common after DP compared with PD (34.5 vs 27.2%; P < .001); however, the incidence of any complication was greater after PD (64.9 vs 53.2%; P < .001). When POPFs occurred, they were more likely to be the highest-graded complication after DP compared with PD (65.1 vs 51.6%; P < .001). ACB significantly varied between PDs and DPs for grade C POPFs (0.804 vs 0.611; P < .001). POPFs accounted for 31.2% of the overall complication burden after DP compared with 17.5% of the burden after PD. ACB differed significantly across both institutions and surgeons in terms of POPFs, nonfistulous complications, and overall complications (all P < .05). Conclusion Although POPFs occur less frequently after PD, they are associated with a greater complication burden compared with DP. ACB varies significantly between health care providers, suggesting the need for risk-adjusted comparisons of complication severity. Using ACB to evaluate a distinct morbidity has the potential to aid in assessing the impact of procedure-specific complications. |
Author | Christein, John D., MD Callery, Mark P., MD Behrman, Stephen W., MD Miller, Benjamin C., BA McMillan, Matthew T., BA Sprys, Michael H., MS Vollmer, Charles M., MD Kent, Tara S., MD Strasberg, Steven M., MD Drebin, Jeffrey A., MD, PhD Watkins, Ammara A., MD Hollis, Robert H., MD |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: McMillan, Matthew T., BA – sequence: 2 fullname: Christein, John D., MD – sequence: 3 fullname: Callery, Mark P., MD – sequence: 4 fullname: Behrman, Stephen W., MD – sequence: 5 fullname: Drebin, Jeffrey A., MD, PhD – sequence: 6 fullname: Hollis, Robert H., MD – sequence: 7 fullname: Kent, Tara S., MD – sequence: 8 fullname: Miller, Benjamin C., BA – sequence: 9 fullname: Sprys, Michael H., MS – sequence: 10 fullname: Watkins, Ammara A., MD – sequence: 11 fullname: Strasberg, Steven M., MD – sequence: 12 fullname: Vollmer, Charles M., MD |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26670325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVJaDZp_0AOxcdcvB1JtmRDKIQl_YBAD2nPQpbGiba2tJXswP77yGyyhxxyErzzzAt65pyc-OCRkEsKawpUfN2u0xwf1gxonYM1sOYDWdGas1JyQU_ICoC3pQABZ-Q8pS0AtBVtPpIzJoQEzuoV0Zsw7nR0_qGYHrHo5mjRF6EvdtqbiHpypuhdmuZBp0L3E8bjJNg5ZBjNFMZ9ob0tbAb1cAQOk0_ktNdDws8v7wX5-_32z-Zneff7x6_NzV1pKkqn0nCkBitpK9ExrBoJWiPHFrATdU56AQ2zRjLb0R6Qdm2L0jDLTF-h0IxfkKtD7y6G_zOmSY0uGRwG7THMSVEpWcO5bNuMsgNqYkgpYq920Y067hUFtahVW7WoVYvaJctq89KXl_65G9EeV15dZuD6AGD-5ZPDqJJx6A1aF7MKZYN7v__bm3UzOO-MHv7hHtM2zNFnf4qqxBSo--W4y21pnc8KdcOfARSZo-s |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_016_3289_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2017_1417474 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_018_3959_7 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_14554_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msec_2019_109786 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_890518 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_03_007 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43856_022_00087_7 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002673 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_843 crossref_primary_10_1111_iwj_14755 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_016_0336_5 crossref_primary_10_1177_14574969231167781 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2019_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2020_10_043 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_020_05823_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000003205 crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_17673 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2024_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_016_5762_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2018_07_024 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10585_020_10029_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2020_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2018_11_012 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_022_02128_w crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_017_0810_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2023_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_934 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11247516 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2016_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2020_09_008 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000001892 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_03_044 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_07_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2017_10_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_04_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2020_07_056 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2019_2272 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004921 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_016_3286_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPA_0000000000001454 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPA_0000000000002023 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000006060 crossref_primary_10_2147_TCRM_S361332 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_023_03053_6 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002532 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002375 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_023_07175_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_017_3564_1 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_017_6281_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2021_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2019_6020 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_017_3547_2 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1765_4402 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0205748 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v30_i10_1329 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2020_11_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2019_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_02_064 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2021_12_017 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_022_09830_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_021_08611_x crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002327 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_09251_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04155_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2019_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2022_07_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2023_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_022_01650_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004068 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002491 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_838 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2022_11_030 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000004549 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2023_12_050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2019_02_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2019_02_016 crossref_primary_10_1093_bjsopen_zrae059 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_022_06736_5 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.023 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.019 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00074.x 10.1002/bjs.5000 10.1007/s00534-005-0990-3 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.011 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.013 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 10.1001/archsurg.2010.118 10.1007/s11605-007-0180-5 10.1007/s00534-008-1332-z 10.1007/s00423-014-1220-8 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.01.287 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00790-0 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.036 10.1097/00000658-199502000-00006 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000843 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.004 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.064 10.1111/hpb.12293 10.1111/hpb.12131 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030065013 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Elsevier Inc. 2016 Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: 2016 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1532-7361 |
EndPage | 1022 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_surg_2015_10_028 26670325 S0039606015009058 1_s2_0_S0039606015009058 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .XZ .~1 0R~ 0SF 123 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~. 1~5 354 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8F7 8P~ AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXKI AAXUO ABBQC ABCQX ABFNM ABFRF ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACRLP ACWUS ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADVLN AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFKWA AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV C45 CAG COF CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FD6 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W J5H K-O KOM L7B M41 MO0 N4W N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OBH OHH OJ0 OV0 OVD OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TEORI UDS UGJ UHS UQV UQZ UV1 VVN WH7 X7M YOC Z5R ZGI ZXP ZY1 ~G- AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR ZA5 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c3e1ce47d46b2e4870aae3e90eb65b2ef6082dc72db1f0e1b99e7c2d2cf4e6a23 |
ISSN | 0039-6060 |
IngestDate | Sat Oct 05 05:05:12 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 19:02:18 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:58:10 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:24:43 EST 2024 Tue Oct 15 22:56:07 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c411t-c3e1ce47d46b2e4870aae3e90eb65b2ef6082dc72db1f0e1b99e7c2d2cf4e6a23 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-0519-2577 0000-0001-5874-406X |
PMID | 26670325 |
PQID | 1772833799 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1772833799 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2015_10_028 pubmed_primary_26670325 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_surg_2015_10_028 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0039606015009058 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2016 text: 2016-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Surgery |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Clavien, Sanabria, Strasberg (bib8) 1992; 111 Miller, Christein, Behrman, Callery, Drebin, Kent (bib7) 2013; 15 McMillan, Vollmer, Asbun, Ball, Bassi, Beane (bib23) 2015 Pratt, Maithel, Vanounou, Callery, Vollmer (bib2) 2006; 10 Sanford, Woolsey, Hall, Linehan, Hawkins, Fields (bib24) 2014; 219 Schmidt, Turrini, Parikh, House, Zyromski, Nakeeb (bib11) 2010; 145 Vollmer, Lewis, Hall, Allendorf, Beane, Behrman (bib5) 2015; 261 Truty, Sawyer, Que (bib19) 2007; 11 Fernandez-del Castillo, Rattner, Warshaw (bib1) 1995; 130 McMillan, Vollmer (bib22) 2014; 399 Lee, Lewis, Strasberg, Hall, Allendorf, Beane (bib6) 2014; 16 Fahy, Frey, Ho, Beckett, Bold (bib14) 2002; 183 Hashimoto (bib10) 2012 Porembka, Hall, Hirbe, Strasberg (bib3) 2010; 210 Strasberg, Hall (bib4) 2011; 213 Kuroki, Tajima, Kanematsu (bib16) 2005; 12 Bassi, Dervenis, Butturini, Fingerhut, Yeo, Izbicki (bib9) 2005; 138 Knaebel, Diener, Wente, Buchler, Seiler (bib13) 2005; 92 Kitagawa, Ohta, Tani, Tajima, Nakagawara, Ohnishi (bib20) 2008; 15 Konishi, Hiraishi, Kubota, Bandai, Makuuchi, Idezuki (bib17) 1995; 221 Balzano, Zerbi, Cristallo, Di Carlo (bib15) 2005; 9 Abe, Sugiyama, Suzuki, Yamaguchi, Yanagida, Masaki (bib18) 2006; 191 Pitt, Kilbane, Strasberg, Pawlik, Dixon, Zyromski (bib25) 2009; 11 Tseng, Pisters, Lee, Wang, Gomez, Sun (bib12) 2007; 141 Sudo, Murakami, Uemura, Hayashidani, Hashimoto, Nakashima (bib21) 2011; 202 Lee (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib6) 2014; 16 Porembka (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib3) 2010; 210 Clavien (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib8) 1992; 111 McMillan (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib23) 2015 Strasberg (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib4) 2011; 213 Vollmer (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib5) 2015; 261 Abe (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib18) 2006; 191 Sudo (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib21) 2011; 202 Schmidt (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib11) 2010; 145 Tseng (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib12) 2007; 141 Kitagawa (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib20) 2008; 15 Knaebel (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib13) 2005; 92 Pratt (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib2) 2006; 10 Kuroki (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib16) 2005; 12 Hashimoto (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib10) 2012 Sanford (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib24) 2014; 219 Truty (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib19) 2007; 11 Konishi (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib17) 1995; 221 Miller (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib7) 2013; 15 Fernandez-del Castillo (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib1) 1995; 130 Pitt (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib25) 2009; 11 Fahy (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib14) 2002; 183 Balzano (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib15) 2005; 9 McMillan (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib22) 2014; 399 Bassi (10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib9) 2005; 138 |
References_xml | – volume: 145 start-page: 634 year: 2010 end-page: 640 ident: bib11 article-title: Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience publication-title: Arch Surg contributor: fullname: Nakeeb – volume: 202 start-page: 77 year: 2011 end-page: 81 ident: bib21 article-title: Distal pancreatectomy with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy: a novel technique for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula publication-title: Am J Surg contributor: fullname: Nakashima – year: 2012 ident: bib10 article-title: The Pancreas Club ISGPS calculator contributor: fullname: Hashimoto – volume: 11 start-page: 405 year: 2009 end-page: 413 ident: bib25 article-title: ACS-NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB-NSQIP option publication-title: HPB contributor: fullname: Zyromski – volume: 141 start-page: 456 year: 2007 end-page: 463 ident: bib12 article-title: The learning curve in pancreatic surgery publication-title: Surgery contributor: fullname: Sun – volume: 183 start-page: 237 year: 2002 end-page: 241 ident: bib14 article-title: Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy publication-title: Am J Surg contributor: fullname: Bold – volume: 111 start-page: 518 year: 1992 end-page: 526 ident: bib8 article-title: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy publication-title: Surgery contributor: fullname: Strasberg – volume: 92 start-page: 539 year: 2005 end-page: 546 ident: bib13 article-title: Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy publication-title: Br J Surg contributor: fullname: Seiler – volume: 261 start-page: 527 year: 2015 end-page: 536 ident: bib5 article-title: Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index publication-title: Ann Surg contributor: fullname: Behrman – volume: 11 start-page: 998 year: 2007 end-page: 1007 ident: bib19 article-title: Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg contributor: fullname: Que – volume: 15 start-page: 781 year: 2013 end-page: 788 ident: bib7 article-title: Assessing the impact of a fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy using the Post-operative Morbidity Index publication-title: HPB contributor: fullname: Kent – volume: 219 start-page: 407 year: 2014 end-page: 415 ident: bib24 article-title: Variations in definition and method of retrieval of complications influence outcomes statistics after pancreatoduodenectomy: comparison of NSQIP with non-NSQIP methods publication-title: J Am Coll Surg contributor: fullname: Fields – volume: 399 start-page: 811 year: 2014 end-page: 824 ident: bib22 article-title: Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy publication-title: Langenbeck Arch Surg contributor: fullname: Vollmer – volume: 191 start-page: 198 year: 2006 end-page: 200 ident: bib18 article-title: Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting for prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula development after distal pancreatectomy publication-title: Am J Surg contributor: fullname: Masaki – volume: 221 start-page: 165 year: 1995 end-page: 170 ident: bib17 article-title: Segmental occlusion of the pancreatic duct with prolamine to prevent fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy publication-title: Ann Surg contributor: fullname: Idezuki – volume: 210 start-page: 286 year: 2010 end-page: 298 ident: bib3 article-title: Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program publication-title: J Am Coll Surg contributor: fullname: Strasberg – volume: 12 start-page: 283 year: 2005 end-page: 285 ident: bib16 article-title: Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg contributor: fullname: Kanematsu – volume: 9 start-page: 837 year: 2005 end-page: 842 ident: bib15 article-title: The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy: the benefit of cautious drain management publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg contributor: fullname: Di Carlo – volume: 10 start-page: 1264 year: 2006 end-page: 1278 ident: bib2 article-title: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg contributor: fullname: Vollmer – volume: 130 start-page: 295 year: 1995 end-page: 299 ident: bib1 article-title: Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s publication-title: Arch Surg contributor: fullname: Warshaw – year: 2015 ident: bib23 article-title: The characterization and prediction of ISGPF grade c fistulas following pancreatoduodenectomy publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg contributor: fullname: Beane – volume: 15 start-page: 377 year: 2008 end-page: 383 ident: bib20 article-title: Nonclosure technique with saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery in management of the cut surface after distal pancreatectomy publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg contributor: fullname: Ohnishi – volume: 16 start-page: 915 year: 2014 end-page: 923 ident: bib6 article-title: Defining the post-operative morbidity index for distal pancreatectomy publication-title: HPB contributor: fullname: Beane – volume: 213 start-page: 616 year: 2011 end-page: 626 ident: bib4 article-title: Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications publication-title: J Am Coll Surg contributor: fullname: Hall – volume: 138 start-page: 8 year: 2005 end-page: 13 ident: bib9 article-title: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition publication-title: Surgery contributor: fullname: Izbicki – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib10 contributor: fullname: Hashimoto – volume: 202 start-page: 77 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib21 article-title: Distal pancreatectomy with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy: a novel technique for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.023 contributor: fullname: Sudo – volume: 213 start-page: 616 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib4 article-title: Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.019 contributor: fullname: Strasberg – volume: 11 start-page: 405 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib25 article-title: ACS-NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB-NSQIP option publication-title: HPB doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00074.x contributor: fullname: Pitt – volume: 92 start-page: 539 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib13 article-title: Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.5000 contributor: fullname: Knaebel – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib23 article-title: The characterization and prediction of ISGPF grade c fistulas following pancreatoduodenectomy publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg contributor: fullname: McMillan – volume: 12 start-page: 283 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib16 article-title: Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg doi: 10.1007/s00534-005-0990-3 contributor: fullname: Kuroki – volume: 10 start-page: 1264 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib2 article-title: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.011 contributor: fullname: Pratt – volume: 141 start-page: 456 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib12 article-title: The learning curve in pancreatic surgery publication-title: Surgery doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.013 contributor: fullname: Tseng – volume: 138 start-page: 8 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib9 article-title: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition publication-title: Surgery doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 contributor: fullname: Bassi – volume: 111 start-page: 518 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib8 article-title: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy publication-title: Surgery contributor: fullname: Clavien – volume: 145 start-page: 634 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib11 article-title: Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience publication-title: Arch Surg doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.118 contributor: fullname: Schmidt – volume: 11 start-page: 998 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib19 article-title: Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0180-5 contributor: fullname: Truty – volume: 15 start-page: 377 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib20 article-title: Nonclosure technique with saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery in management of the cut surface after distal pancreatectomy publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg doi: 10.1007/s00534-008-1332-z contributor: fullname: Kitagawa – volume: 399 start-page: 811 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib22 article-title: Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy publication-title: Langenbeck Arch Surg doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1220-8 contributor: fullname: McMillan – volume: 9 start-page: 837 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib15 article-title: The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy: the benefit of cautious drain management publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.01.287 contributor: fullname: Balzano – volume: 183 start-page: 237 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib14 article-title: Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00790-0 contributor: fullname: Fahy – volume: 191 start-page: 198 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib18 article-title: Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting for prophylaxis of pancreatic fistula development after distal pancreatectomy publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.036 contributor: fullname: Abe – volume: 221 start-page: 165 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib17 article-title: Segmental occlusion of the pancreatic duct with prolamine to prevent fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/00000658-199502000-00006 contributor: fullname: Konishi – volume: 261 start-page: 527 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib5 article-title: Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000843 contributor: fullname: Vollmer – volume: 210 start-page: 286 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib3 article-title: Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.004 contributor: fullname: Porembka – volume: 219 start-page: 407 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib24 article-title: Variations in definition and method of retrieval of complications influence outcomes statistics after pancreatoduodenectomy: comparison of NSQIP with non-NSQIP methods publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.064 contributor: fullname: Sanford – volume: 16 start-page: 915 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib6 article-title: Defining the post-operative morbidity index for distal pancreatectomy publication-title: HPB doi: 10.1111/hpb.12293 contributor: fullname: Lee – volume: 15 start-page: 781 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib7 article-title: Assessing the impact of a fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy using the Post-operative Morbidity Index publication-title: HPB doi: 10.1111/hpb.12131 contributor: fullname: Miller – volume: 130 start-page: 295 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028_bib1 article-title: Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s publication-title: Arch Surg doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030065013 contributor: fullname: Fernandez-del Castillo |
SSID | ssj0009418 |
Score | 2.5331347 |
Snippet | Background Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare... Differences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare POPFs after... BACKGROUNDDifferences in the behavior of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) have been described after various pancreatic resections. Here, we compare... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1013 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Cost of Illness Databases, Factual Female Humans Incidence Male Middle Aged Pancreatectomy - methods Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology Pancreatic Fistula - etiology Pancreaticoduodenectomy Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Severity of Illness Index Surgery |
Title | Comparing the burden of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0039606015009058 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26670325 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1772833799 |
Volume | 159 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwELa6y4ULAvEqsMhI3KJUtuMk9ZHtdrUSAiFaBOJiJX6AVkuDms3_Z_xI-tgtAiQuUWVPE8fzeWY8mfEg9JozS4gpqrRWPEt5aXUqOHcxDTk3FTOgFFw28sWifP9lejbn89GorwC2afuvnIY24LXLnP0Lbg83hQb4DTyHK3Adrn_E91koLBiToGqfpeDDmoG93kBUiQXWdmA1xwLhfU-juwaInRv_RziVSTvj8mogCD3b5uxiK6naO_dcamFwqcZC4slysusOCKcZxBKbPm7nzFO8G0KPZ668S_i67zKJkg97_afm-7r324YYteTzNkn0YdBiK_QlyuVMpLCVIrcK9eBfuARtsv7mgvHyiYvHiznlOydoz2dvadqyCUkX7pbujmDwEkHyPeKw_5Etk0TeID1CdxiILRcg-jX_uDnCmdOg1-NYYwpWiBbcH9shM-fQNsabM8v76F7ch-A3AUAP0MisHqJqAA8G3uEAHtxYvAEP7sGDPXjwreDBAB4cwIN3wfMIfTqfL2cXaazBkSpO6XWqMkOV4aXmRQ0rF6R7VZnMCGLqIocWW4ANqVXJdE0tMbQWwpSKaaYsBxHAssfoeNWszFOEbUXtVBV1WU4Np7oQmomCWWYI6DjQA2OU9FMmf4ajVmQfg3gp3QRLN8GuDSZ4jMp-VmWfRAxqz7RxLbbyEHvHKB_-Gc3MYD5KANxvn_iqZ54EGew-rFUr03TwJNiiTrOsFGKMngSuDm8ABjAoVZY_--fxPkd3N2vmBTq-XnfmBB21unvpAfoLKDyxCw |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,27935,27936 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+the+burden+of+pancreatic+fistulas+after+pancreatoduodenectomy+and+distal+pancreatectomy&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=McMillan%2C+Matthew+T.%2C+BA&rft.au=Christein%2C+John+D.%2C+MD&rft.au=Callery%2C+Mark+P.%2C+MD&rft.au=Behrman%2C+Stephen+W.%2C+MD&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.surg.2015.10.028&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0039606015009058&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0039606015009058 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0039-6060&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0039-6060&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0039-6060&client=summon |