Optimization of key parameters for porosity measurement of shale gas reservoirs

• Published in: Natural Gas Industry B Vol. 8; no. 5; pp. 455 - 463
• Main Authors: Shangwen Zhou, Dazhong Dong, Jiehui Zhang, Chen Zou, Chong Tian, Yun Rui, Dexun Liu, Pengfei Jiao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd 01-10-2021
• Subjects: GIP method; NMR; Porosity; Reservoir; Shale gas; WIP method
• ISSN: 2352-8540
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ngib.2021.08.004

Porosity is a key parameter in shale gas reservoir evaluation and reserve calculation and its accurate test is the basis for calculating geological reserves of shale gas and determining development plans. In order to clarify the differences between different porosity test methods and their influences on the calculation results of shale gas reserves, we collected 65 shale samples of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation from six shale gas wells in the Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area of the southern Sichuan Basin for comparative experiments using three porosity test method, including gas injection porosimetry (GIP) method, water immersion porosimetry (WIP) method and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method. Then, these three methods were comparatively analyzed based on the test results. Finally, it was proposed to optimize the key parameters of these three shale porosity test methods. And the following research results were obtained. First, in terms of the GIP method, the particle size of shale sample shall be in the range of 20–60 mesh and the helium saturation equilibrium time shall be over 1800 s. Second, in terms of the WIP method, the sample shall be dried for at least 48 h under 110 °C and saturated for 24 h under the confining pressure of 15 MPa. Third, in terms of the NMR method, NMR porosity calculation shall not be conducted until the NMR signal of the dried sample is deducted, on the basis of echo time and waiting time optimization. Fourth, porosity average and median value obtained by these three shale porosity test methods follow the relationship of WIP porosity > NMR porosity > particle GIP porosity > plunger GIP porosity. Fifth, different shale porosity test methods have greater influences on the calculation results of shale gas geological reserves, whose difference can reach 20%. In conclusion, during the application of NMR method and WIP method, fluid is introduced for saturation, which may damage the shale pores. However, the particle GIP porosity can reflect the entire space of shale more comprehensively and is not influenced by the properties of the applied fluid. Therefore, it is suggested to adopt the particle GIP method to calculate shale gas geological reserves.