Pavlovian conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex in harnessed foragers using paired vs. unpaired and discrimination learning paradigms: tests for differences among honeybee subspecies in Turkey

Experiments utilized three honeybee subspecies from very distinct biomes ( Apis mellifera caucasica , A.m. carnica, A.m. syriaca ). In experiment one a simple association between odor and a sucrose feeding was readily established in all three subspecies. This association decreased when the condition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Apidologie Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 428 - 435
Main Authors: Abramson, Charles I., Mixson, T. Andrew, Çakmak, Ibrahim, Place, Aaron J., Wells, Harrington
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01-07-2008
EDP Sciences
Springer Verlag
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Experiments utilized three honeybee subspecies from very distinct biomes ( Apis mellifera caucasica , A.m. carnica, A.m. syriaca ). In experiment one a simple association between odor and a sucrose feeding was readily established in all three subspecies. This association decreased when the conditioned stimulus was no longer followed by a feeding. Neither the learning rate nor extinction rate differed among subspecies. Unpaired controls confirmed that the acquisition of the odor-food association is learned. In experiment two, an attempt to uncover subspecies differences was tested through the ability of bees to discriminate between two odors, one of which is paired with a feeding. Rapid learning occurred in all subspecies and no significant subspecies differences were observed. Finally, discrimination learning was used as an added control to test for honeybee response to an olfactory versus mechanical (air) stimulus.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0044-8435
1297-9678
DOI:10.1051/apido:2008025