Bioelectric impedance analysis: experience with male patients with cirrhosis

• Published in: Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 13; no. 5; p. 892
• Main Authors: Guglielmi, F W, Contento, F, Laddaga, L, Panella, C, Francavilla, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-05-1991
• Subjects: Anthropometry; Ascites - complications; Ascites - diagnosis; Body Composition; Body Water - chemistry; Electric Conductivity; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis - complications; Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis; Male; Middle Aged; Reproducibility of Results
• ISSN: 0270-9139
• DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840130515

Bioelectric impedance analysis is a new, convenient and portable method used to estimate total body water and to assess body composition in healthy people. We used the tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance analysis method in 58 cirrhotic patients to assess its clinical applicability. Whole-body resistance, reactance and impedance were measured and compared with those of 30 healthy volunteers matched for age and sex. The resistance and impedance values of ascitic cirrhotic patients (resistance = 461 +/- 80 omega; impedance = 462 +/- 80 omega) and nonascitic cirrhotic patients (resistance = 487 +/- 96 omega; impedance = 489 +/- 97 omega) were comparable with the resistance (488 +/- 44 omega) and impedance (491 +/- 44 omega) of controls. However, a significant (p less than 0.05) reduction in whole body reactance was found in patients with ascites and in those without ascites (34 +/- 9 omega vs. 47 +/- 12 omega) as compared with healthy subjects (56 +/- 7 omega). In 10 ascitic patients total body water was determined both before and after paracentesis; the volume of intraperitoneal fluid removed (7.9 +/- 3.8 L) could not be fully accounted for but only detected as an average volume of 1.9 +/- 1.0 L independently of the initial volume of the ascites. Our data clearly demonstrate that tetrapolar bioelectric impedance analysis is not adequate for measuring variations of "compartmentalized" fluid in the abdomen.