Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)

Abstract Background Reoperation after primary breast augmentation remains an important clinical issue. Objective The authors sought to evaluate incidence and causes of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation. Methods This retrospective, noninterventional study conducted at 16 Cana...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aesthetic surgery journal Vol. 39; no. 12; pp. 1342 - 1349
Main Authors: Khanna, Julie, Mosher, Mathew, Whidden, Paul, Nguyen, Sébastien, Garzon, Diego, Bhogal, Meetu
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: US Oxford University Press 13-11-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Reoperation after primary breast augmentation remains an important clinical issue. Objective The authors sought to evaluate incidence and causes of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation. Methods This retrospective, noninterventional study conducted at 16 Canadian sites reviewed medical records and patient-completed questionnaires of women who underwent primary breast augmentation with smooth or textured Natrelle Inspira implants containing TruForm 1 or TruForm 2 gel. Patients were aged ≥22 years, received implants via inframammary fold incision, and returned for follow-up at 2 to 4 years. Results A total of 319 women received Inspira implants (smooth TruForm 2, n = 205; textured TruForm 2, n = 99; smooth or textured TruForm 1, n = 15). At follow-up, 30 women (9.4%) had undergone reoperation, including 19 (9.3%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 9 (9.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. The mean time to reoperation was 1.2 years; the risk rate for reoperation was 9.9% at 3 years. The most common reasons for reoperation were implant malposition (36.7%), capsular contracture (33.3%), and the patient’s request for a change in implant size or style (20.0%). Most women were very or somewhat satisfied with the initial surgery (89.3% overall; 90.7% smooth TruForm 2; 86.9% textured TruForm 2). Thirty-four women (10.7%) reported adverse events, including 20 (9.8%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 14 (14.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. Conclusions This analysis suggests that Natrelle Inspira TruForm 2 implants are safe when used in primary breast augmentation, resulting in low reoperation rates that are consistent with those for other breast implants. Level of Evidence: 4
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Dr Nguyen is a plastic surgeon in private practice in Quebec, QC, Canada.
Dr Mosher is a plastic surgeon in private practice in Langley, BC, Canada.
Dr Whidden is a plastic surgeon in private practice in Calgary, AB, Canada.
Dr Garzon is a Director, Scientific Assessment, and Ms Bhogal is a Manager, Medical Research, Allergan plc, Markham, ON, Canada.
Dr Khanna is a plastic surgeon in private practice in Oakville, ON, Canada.
ISSN:1090-820X
1527-330X
DOI:10.1093/asj/sjy289