Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy

• Published in: International journal of particle therapy Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 40 - 49
• Main Authors: Halthore, Aditya, Fellows, Zachary, Tran, Anh, Deville, Jr, Curtiland, Wright, Jean L, Meyer, Jeffrey, Li, Heng, Sheikh, Khadija
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2023; Elsevier
• Subjects: bulky tumors; grid; Original; proton; spatial fractionation; spatial fractionation; bulky tumors; GRID; proton
• ISSN: 2331-5180; 2331-5180
• DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-22-00028

To compare spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) treatment planning techniques using proton pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) and photon therapy.
PBS and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) GRID plans were retrospectively generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. GRID targets were arranged along the long axis of the gross tumor, spaced 2 and 3 cm apart, and treated with a prescription of 18 Gy. PBS plans used 2- to 3-beam multiple-field optimization with robustness evaluation. Dosimetric parameters including peak-to-edge ratio (PEDR), ratio of dose to 90% of the valley to dose to 10% of the peak VPDR(D90/D10), and volume of normal tissue receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) and 10 Gy (V10) were calculated. The peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), VPDR(D90/D10), and organ-at-risk doses were prospectively assessed in 2 patients undergoing PBS-GRID with pretreatment quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans.
PBS and VMAT GRID plans were generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. Gross tumor volume values ranged from 826 to 1468 cm
. Peak-to-edge ratio for PBS was higher than for VMAT for both spacing scenarios (2-cm spacing,
= .02; 3-cm spacing,
= .01). VPDR(D90/D10) for PBS was higher than for VMAT (2-cm spacing,
= .004; 3-cm spacing,
= .002). Normal tissue V5 was lower for PBS than for VMAT (2-cm spacing,
= .03; 3-cm spacing,
= .02). Normal tissue mean dose was lower with PBS than with VMAT (2-cm spacing,
.03; 3-cm spacing,
.02). Two patients treated using PBS GRID and assessed with pretreatment QACT scans demonstrated robust PVDR, VPDR(D90/D10), and organs-at-risk doses.
The PEDR was significantly higher for PBS than VMAT plans, indicating lower target edge dose. Normal tissue mean dose was significantly lower with PBS than VMAT. PBS GRID may result in lower normal tissue dose compared with VMAT plans, allowing for further dose escalation in patients with bulky disease.