Landscape of chromosome number changes in prostate cancer progression

Purpose Both genetic instability resulting in aneuploidy and increased proliferative activity are common features of tumor development and progression. Cytometric evaluation of tumor ploidy status was recently suggested as a prognostic marker. However, in prostate cancer (PCa), a chromosome-specific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of urology Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 1489 - 1495
Main Authors: Braun, Martin, Stomper, Julia, Kirsten, Robert, Adler, David, Vogel, Wenzel, Böhm, Diana, Wernert, Nicolas, Kristiansen, Glen, Perner, Sven
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-12-2013
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Both genetic instability resulting in aneuploidy and increased proliferative activity are common features of tumor development and progression. Cytometric evaluation of tumor ploidy status was recently suggested as a prognostic marker. However, in prostate cancer (PCa), a chromosome-specific evaluation is lacking. With the present study, we sought to identify distinct chromosomal changes to complement cytometric results concerning the diagnosis and prognosis of PCa patients. Methods We assessed a cohort of 428 PCa specimens (186 localized PCa, 75 lymph node metastasized PCa, 125 lymph node metastases, 42 hormone-refractory distant metastases) for numerical alterations of all 24 chromosomes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Conducting immunohistochemistry with phosphorylated histone H3 (PHH3) and Ki-67, we quantified the proliferation rate. FISH results were fit in a linear model and tested for predictive power. Results As expected, we observed a significant increase in aneuploidy with advancing tumor stage. Similarly, an increased expression of the mitotic marker PHH3 was significantly associated with aneuploidy and higher pT-stage. We found aneusomy of chromosomes 4, 6, 20, and X to be indicative of lymph node metastasized PCa. However, with an AUC of 65 %, this set of chromosomal changes was poorly suited to distinguish non-metastasized and lymph node metastasized primary tumors. Conclusion Our results provide thorough insight into the so far incompletely elucidated chromosomal landscape of PCa. While overall ploidy status and PHH3 expression in primary tumors indicate advanced disease, a FISH-based test for distinct alterations does not seem to be beneficial for diagnostic or prognostic decisions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-013-1051-1