A review and p-curve analysis of research on the menstrual cycle correlates of consumer preferences and economic decisions
A number of studies have been claimed to show that ovarian hormones, whose levels fluctuate throughout the menstrual cycle, affect consumer preferences and financial decisions. The present article aims to critically analyze the literature examining associations between the phases of the menstrual cy...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hormones and behavior Vol. 150; p. 105317 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-04-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A number of studies have been claimed to show that ovarian hormones, whose levels fluctuate throughout the menstrual cycle, affect consumer preferences and financial decisions. The present article aims to critically analyze the literature examining associations between the phases of the menstrual cycle (peri-ovulatory vs. non-ovulatory) with particular consumer preferences (especially regarding clothing choices) and economic decisions (especially in regards to economic games and risk-taking). A search for studies was conducted in Web of Science and Scopus between 2004 and 2022, by combining keywords of the menstrual cycle, consumer preferences, and economic decisions. Once articles were selected, we identified the main findings, the characteristics of the population, and the methods for determining the phases of the cycle. We performed a p-curve analysis on previously reported statistically significant effects. These analyses find evidence for associations between peri-ovulatory status and specific consumer preferences, most strongly for appearance-enhancing products. They yield no compelling evidence for associations between peri-ovulatory status and financial decisions and risk-taking. We offer provisional conclusions and call for additional studies that possess sufficient statistical power to detect true meaningful effects, especially in the domain of financial decisions.
•There is evidence for associations between peri-ovulatory status and specific consumer preferences, most strongly for appearance-enhancing products.•There is not compelling evidence for associations between peri-ovulatory status and financial decisions and risk-taking.•In general, studies examining consumer preferences and economic decisions in relation to peri-ovulatory status have been woefully underpowered. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0018-506X 1095-6867 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105317 |