Influence of Perindopril on Left Ventricular Global Performance During the Early Phase of Inferior Acute Myocardial Infarction: Assessment by Tei Index

• Published in: Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 319 - 327
• Main Authors: Nearchou, Nearchos S., Tsakiris, Alexandros K., Lolaka, Maria D., Zarcos, Ilias, Skoufas, Dimitrios P., Skoufas, Panagiotis D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA Blackwell Science Inc 01-05-2003
• Subjects: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use; Doppler-index of overall myocardial performance; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Humans; inferior acute myocardial infarction; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction - diagnostic imaging; Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy; perindopril; Perindopril - therapeutic use; Tei index; Time Factors; Ventricular Function, Left - drug effects
• ISSN: 0742-2822; 1540-8175
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2003.03037.x

The beneficial effect of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) on left ventricular (LV) function in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is widely known. However, controversy exists about their efficacy on patients with small infarcts and preserved LV systolic function. The aim of the present study was to detect the influence of the ACE‐I perindopril on the global LV performance in patients with pure inferior AMI (AMI‐I) using a Doppler‐derived index (DI) that combines systolic and diastolic time intervals (Tei index). Our study included 40 patients with first AMI‐I, mean age 60 years ± 9.06 years (SD) and 24 age‐ and gender‐matched normal patients who constituted the control group (COG). Patients were randomized into two groups to receive the conventional treatment of AMI‐I (GCT) or the above therapy plus P (GP). Complete Doppler echocardiography (systolic and diastolic parameters), DI, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured on the
8.07 ± 1.16
(SD) post‐infarct day. The same examination was performed to COG. The DI was significantly lower in healthy patients
(0.45 ± 0.23)
compared with the value in patients of either GP
(0.56 ± 0.03; P = 0.023)
or GCT
(0.78 ± 0.05; P = 0.000)
. Moreover DI was higher in patients of GCT compared with that of GP(P = 0.000). In addition, perindopril administration decreased isovolumic relaxation time(IRT; 120.00 ± 4.23 vs. 139.00 ± 6.74; P = 0.006)and increased significantly ejection time (ET;274.25 ± 7.35 vs. 253.50 ± 7.68; P = 0.042). SBP in patients of GP was similar to that of GCT(120.5 ± 2.85 mmHg vs. 112.5 ± 3.49 mmHg; P = NS). Conclusions: Global LV function (DI) is impaired in patients with AMI‐I. Administration of perindopril has a favorable impact on LV performance in patients with AMI‐I, achieved through improvement of the diastolic function (IRT), which indirectly improves LV systolic function (ET, DI). This beneficial influence of perindopril is the result of the direct tissue effect of the drug and not its hemodynamic action. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Volume 20, May 2003)