Reservoir Quality, Lithotype Assessment, and Geochemical Source Rock Analysis: Insights from Well Logs and Pyrolysis Data, Karama Field, North-Western Desert, Egypt

• Published in: Geofluids Vol. 2024; pp. 1 - 22
• Main Authors: Mamdouh, Mahmoud, Reda, Mohamed, Raef, Abdelmoneam, El Din, M. Y. Zein, Abdelhafeez, Tharwat H., Al-Hashim, Mansour H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester Hindawi 2024; Hindawi Limited; Hindawi-Wiley
• Subjects: Biomarkers; Decision making; Drilling; Effective porosity; Enhanced oil recovery; Environmental degradation; Fault lines; Geochemistry; Geology; Hydrocarbons; Kerogen; Limestone; Lithofacies; Oil; Oil and gas fields; Oil and gas production; Oil fields; Oil production; Oil reservoirs; Organic matter; Permeability; Petroleum; Petroleum hydrocarbons; Porosity; Pyrolysis; Quality assessment; Reservoirs; Rocks; Sedimentary rocks; Shale; Shales; Stone; Stratigraphy; Trends; Well logs; Western Desert; Egypt
• ISSN: 1468-8115; 1468-8123
• DOI: 10.1155/2024/1235792

Reservoir characteristics and source rock geochemistry are essential for petroleum system investigation as they reveal reservoir quality and hydrocarbon generation capability, respectively. The primary Karama oil field reservoir of Abu El Gharadig Basin is the limestone-sand-shale Abu Roash G (AR/G) Member. This study examines AR/G, analyzes source rocks for maturity and organic elements, and defines the main reservoir lithotypes and evaluates reservoir properties. Five well log datasets and an AR/F pyrolysis analysis on another well were used in this study to characterize the AR/G’s 168-foot effective thickness and assess the AR/F source-rock maturation. The effective porosity is up to 30%. The highest shale concentration was 24% in central and western parts of the field. Therefore, drilling development wells in this area, especially east and north, demands caution. The composition and vertical and lateral lithofacies variations of the defined reservoir in the Karama field region are a significant control of its petrophysical properties. The pyrolysis of AR/F revealed 1.32–5.84% content of organic matter. That content qualifies AR/F as a hydrocarbon source if thermal maturity is reached. Type I and type II kerogen in the Abu Roash F Member suggests oil production. The Abu Roash G Member and Upper Bahariya (UB) formation produce oil and gas due to their own type II and III kerogen. GC biomarker data suggests that the research area is predominantly maritime, with most samples showing environmental degradation. The area under consideration has one reservoir, AR/G, and three members of source rocks in AR/F&G and UB. AR/G electrofacies revealed various lithotypes and flow units.