Feasibility of Conventional Non-Destructive Testing Methods in Detecting Embedded FRP Reinforcements

• Published in: Applied sciences Vol. 13; no. 7; p. 4399
• Main Authors: Malla, Pranit, Khedmatgozar Dolati, Seyed Saman, Ortiz, Jesus D., Mehrabi, Armin B., Nanni, Antonio, Dinh, Kien
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-04-2023
• Subjects: Acoustic emission testing; Analysis; Carbon fiber reinforced plastics; Cathodic protection; Concrete; Construction industry; Corrosion; Corrosion resistance; Damage detection; Durability; Fiber reinforced polymers; fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); Galvanized steel; Glass fiber reinforced plastics; Ground penetrating radar; ground penetrating radar (GPR); Highway construction; Methods; non-destructive testing (NDT); Nondestructive testing; phased array ultrasonic (PAU); Phased arrays; Polymers; Radar arrays; Reinforced concrete; Steel; Strands; Ultrasonic testing; ultrasonic testing (UT); Weight reduction; United Kingdom; Netherlands
• DOI: 10.3390/app13074399
• EISSN: 2076-3417

Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) bars/strands are the most promising alternative to their steel counterparts for reinforcing concrete elements due to their resistance to corrosion, lighter weight, higher strength and better durability. However, very limited research has been conducted in relation to non-destructive testing (NDT) methods that are applicable to damage detection in FRP bars or the detection of FRP reinforcements embedded in concrete. The ability to assess the condition of the relatively new and unique FRP reinforcements will increase the confidence of the construction industry in their use as a reliable substitute for steel reinforcements. This paper investigates the ability of two of the most commonly used NDT methods, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Phased Array Ultrasonic (PAU), in detecting FRP bars/strands embedded in concrete elements. GPR and PAU tests were performed on two slab specimens reinforced with GFRP (Glass-FRP) bars, the most commonly used FRP bar, with variations in their depth, size and configuration, and a slab specimen with different types of available FRP reinforcements. The results show that GPR devices can detect GFRP bars/strands and CFRP (Carbon-FRP) strands to some extent, and their detectability increases with the increase in their antenna center frequency. On the contrary, PAU is only capable of detecting GFRP and CFRP strands. The results of this paper also emphasize the need for further research and developments related to NDT applications to embedded FRP bars.