On the substitution of conventional corrosion tests by an electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation test

Nickel-based alloy 625 was investigated by means of a conventional corrosion test (Streicher-test according to ASTM G28A [1]) and an electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation test (according to ASTM G108 [1], with some modifications). Susceptibility to intergranular corrosion after various heat t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Corrosion science Vol. 52; no. 5; pp. 1582 - 1592
Main Authors: Prohaska, M., Kanduth, H., Mori, G., Grill, R., Tischler, G.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01-05-2010
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nickel-based alloy 625 was investigated by means of a conventional corrosion test (Streicher-test according to ASTM G28A [1]) and an electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation test (according to ASTM G108 [1], with some modifications). Susceptibility to intergranular corrosion after various heat treatments was examined by using both test methods and the results were compared. Dependent on the type of heat treatment applied, both methods showed partially different results. Possibilities and limitations of replacing Streicher-test with EPR-test are pointed out and commentated. In conclusion, the EPR-test presents itself as a promising and quick investigation technique for detecting susceptibility to intergranular corrosion in nickel-based alloys.
ISSN:0010-938X
1879-0496
DOI:10.1016/j.corsci.2010.01.017