Effects of different SRT on anaerobic digestion of MSW dosed with various MSWI ashes

► Suitable MSWI ashes addition improved the MSW anaerobic digestion. ► Biogas enhancement was due to the suitable released metals levels. ► Co, Mo and W were mostly found to stimulate MSW biogas production. ► MSW anaerobic digestion favored SRT20 and SRT40 operation. This study investigated differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresource technology Vol. 125; pp. 233 - 238
Main Authors: Lo, H.M., Chiu, H.Y., Lo, S.W., Lo, F.C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-12-2012
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► Suitable MSWI ashes addition improved the MSW anaerobic digestion. ► Biogas enhancement was due to the suitable released metals levels. ► Co, Mo and W were mostly found to stimulate MSW biogas production. ► MSW anaerobic digestion favored SRT20 and SRT40 operation. This study investigated different solid retention time (SRT) on municipal solid waste (MSW) anaerobic digestion with various MSW incinerator fly ash (FA) and bottom ash (BA) addition. Results showed that biogas production rates (BPRs, ∼200 to ∼400mL/gVS) with organic loading rate of ∼0.053gVS/gVSreactor (Day 1–435, SRT 20days, SRT20) at FA 1g/d (FA1), BA 12g/d (BA12) and BA 24g/d (BA24) dosed bioreactors increased after adaptation. BPRs with SRT10 and SRT5 decreased while BPRs with SRT40 showed to increase compared to initial BPRs (∼200mL/gVS) with SRT20. SRT5 operation reduced the BPRs (∼10 – ∼90mL/gVS) significantly and only BA12 and BA24 dosed bioreactors could recover the BPRs (∼100 – ∼200mL/gVS) after SRT20 operation (Day 613–617) compared to FA1 and FA3 and control. Released levels of Co, Mo and W at BA12 and BA24 dosed bioreactors showed most potential to improve MSW anaerobic digestion.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.084