Radon intercomparison tests – Katowice, 2016

• Published in: Nukleonika Vol. 65; no. 2; pp. 127 - 132
• Main Authors: Chałupnik, Stanisław, Skubacz, Krystian, Wysocka, Małgorzata, Mazur, Jadwiga, Bonczyk, Michał, Kozak, Krzysztof, Grządziel, Dominik, Urban, Paweł, Tchorz-Trzeciakiewicz, Dagmara, Kozłowska, Beata, Walencik-Łata, Agata, Podstawczyńska, Agnieszka, Olszewski, Jerzy, Bartak, Jakub, Karpińska, Maria, Wołoszczuk, Katarzyna, Dohojda, Marek, Nowak, Jakub, Długosz-Lisiecka, Magdalena, Foerster, Elisabeth, Przylibski, Tadeusz A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sciendo 01-06-2020
• Subjects: active and passive monitors; polish radon centre; proficiency test; radon
• ISSN: 0029-5922; 0029-5922
• DOI: 10.2478/nuka-2020-0020

Abstract
At the beginning of the year 2016, the representatives of the Polish Radon Centre decided to organize proficiency tests (PTs) for measurements of radon gas and radon decay products in the air, involving radon monitors and laboratory passive techniques. The Silesian Centre for Environmental Radioactivity of the Central Mining Institute (GIG), Katowice, became responsible for the organization of the PT exercises. The main reason to choose that location was the radon chamber in GIG with a volume of 17 m
3
, the biggest one in Poland. Accordingly, 13 participants from Poland plus one participant from Germany expressed their interest. The participants were invited to inform the organizers about what types of monitors and methods they would like to check during the tests. On this basis, the GIG team prepared the proposal for the schedule of exercises, such as the required level(s) of radon concentrations, the number and periods of tests, proposed potential alpha energy concentration (PAEC) levels and also the overall period of PT. The PT activity was performed between 6th and 17th June 2016. After assessment of the results, the agreement between radon monitors and other measurement methods was confirmed. In the case of PAEC monitors and methods of measurements, the results of PT exercises were consistent and confirmed the accuracy of the calibration procedures used by the participants. The results of the PAEC PTs will be published elsewhere; in this paper, only the results of radon intercomparison are described.