A comparison of bladder and ovarian function two years following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation

To test the hypothesis that at two years bladder and ovarian function function are no different following either simple hysterectomy or endometrial ablation (transcervical resection/laser ablation). Randomised controlled trial comparing hysterectomy with endometrial ablation. Two years after trial e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Vol. 103; no. 9; p. 898
Main Authors: Bhattacharya, S, Mollison, J, Pinion, S, Parkin, D E, Abramovich, D R, Terry, P, Kitchener, H C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 01-09-1996
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract To test the hypothesis that at two years bladder and ovarian function function are no different following either simple hysterectomy or endometrial ablation (transcervical resection/laser ablation). Randomised controlled trial comparing hysterectomy with endometrial ablation. Two years after trial entry bladder and ovarian function were evaluated subjectively by means of questionnaires and objectively by means of cystometry and estimation of serum follicle stimulating hormone respectively. Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. Tow hundred and four women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding who, when recruited to the initial study two years previously, were aged less than 50 years, weighed less than 100 kg, and who would otherwise have undergone hysterectomy. Of the 204 women originally recruited, 101 re-attended the clinic and underwent cystometry and follicle stimulating hormone estimation. These, together with a further 59 women, completed postal questionnaires (79% of original cohort). Rates of stress incontinence (44% vs 44%, 95% CI of difference -16% to +15%), urge incontinence (21% vs 19% 95% CI of difference -11% to +14%), and hot flushes (30% vs 44%, 95% CI of difference -25% to +7%) were similar in the hysterectomy and endometrial ablation groups, respectively. Cystometry revealed 14 (31%) cases of bladder dysfunction after hysterectomy and 17 (35%) after hysteroscopic surgery (95% CI of difference -23% to +15%). Serum follicle stimulating hormone levels > 40 IU/L [corrected] were found in three (6%) women following hysterectomy and five (10%) of women after endometrial ablation. This study suggests that in comparison with endometrial ablation, simple hysterectomy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding does not compromise bladder or ovarian function, at least at two years after the operation. Due to lack of power the estimates of any differences are imprecise, and clinically significant effects cannot be ruled out.
AbstractList To test the hypothesis that at two years bladder and ovarian function function are no different following either simple hysterectomy or endometrial ablation (transcervical resection/laser ablation). Randomised controlled trial comparing hysterectomy with endometrial ablation. Two years after trial entry bladder and ovarian function were evaluated subjectively by means of questionnaires and objectively by means of cystometry and estimation of serum follicle stimulating hormone respectively. Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. Tow hundred and four women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding who, when recruited to the initial study two years previously, were aged less than 50 years, weighed less than 100 kg, and who would otherwise have undergone hysterectomy. Of the 204 women originally recruited, 101 re-attended the clinic and underwent cystometry and follicle stimulating hormone estimation. These, together with a further 59 women, completed postal questionnaires (79% of original cohort). Rates of stress incontinence (44% vs 44%, 95% CI of difference -16% to +15%), urge incontinence (21% vs 19% 95% CI of difference -11% to +14%), and hot flushes (30% vs 44%, 95% CI of difference -25% to +7%) were similar in the hysterectomy and endometrial ablation groups, respectively. Cystometry revealed 14 (31%) cases of bladder dysfunction after hysterectomy and 17 (35%) after hysteroscopic surgery (95% CI of difference -23% to +15%). Serum follicle stimulating hormone levels > 40 IU/L [corrected] were found in three (6%) women following hysterectomy and five (10%) of women after endometrial ablation. This study suggests that in comparison with endometrial ablation, simple hysterectomy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding does not compromise bladder or ovarian function, at least at two years after the operation. Due to lack of power the estimates of any differences are imprecise, and clinically significant effects cannot be ruled out.
Author Mollison, J
Parkin, D E
Abramovich, D R
Terry, P
Bhattacharya, S
Pinion, S
Kitchener, H C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: S
  surname: Bhattacharya
  fullname: Bhattacharya, S
  organization: Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J
  surname: Mollison
  fullname: Mollison, J
– sequence: 3
  givenname: S
  surname: Pinion
  fullname: Pinion, S
– sequence: 4
  givenname: D E
  surname: Parkin
  fullname: Parkin, D E
– sequence: 5
  givenname: D R
  surname: Abramovich
  fullname: Abramovich, D R
– sequence: 6
  givenname: P
  surname: Terry
  fullname: Terry, P
– sequence: 7
  givenname: H C
  surname: Kitchener
  fullname: Kitchener, H C
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8813310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNotj8tqwzAURLVISZO0n1AQ3duVLEu6WobQFwS6addBz9bBlozsNPXf16WZzcAcZmDWaBFT9AjdU1LSWQ_HktaSFoRXUFKlRDkaohRR5c8CrQgjouA1F9doPQxHQoiUol6iJQBljJIV8ltsU9fr3Awp4hSwabVzPmMdHU7fc64jDqdox2bm4znhyes84JDaNp2b-Im_pmH02dsxdRNOGfvoUufHudhiPa_9FW_QVdDt4G8vvkEfT4_vu5di__b8utvuC8sUQGGMNYRzyRVlwWovLFeK-SACQKi1AQPgWOWk0OCckRBIbSqpgRgZ3Ew26O5_tz-ZzrtDn5tO5-lwuVv9AlXUXKk
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_13697130500186560
crossref_primary_10_17116_repro201521648_55
crossref_primary_10_1080_13697130600865774
crossref_primary_10_1097_00006254_200106000_00024
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2004_00163_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11608_009_0222_4
crossref_primary_10_1097_01_OGX_0000120166_84206_DD
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2009_09_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_00_02577_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13224_020_01308_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0957_5847_98_80018_8
crossref_primary_10_1097_OGX_0b013e318240aa28
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2007_01546_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2006_01_032
crossref_primary_10_1097_00006254_199911001_00037
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443610410001685574
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00192_017_3268_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1762_0953_06_75016_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_5415_1998_tb06009_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_00006250_200206000_00006
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2004_00242_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2012_03484_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2005_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1761_3310_07_70059_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2002_01332_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2008_12_019
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2005_24_2_169
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443619768605
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_1997_tb12053_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2004_00164_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1479_828X_2008_00893_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2010_02505_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_gye_17_2_125_131
crossref_primary_10_1097_00003081_199712000_00029
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMoa013336
crossref_primary_10_1097_00003081_199712000_00026
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2005_00696_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2004_00461_x
crossref_primary_10_1136_dtb_2000_381077
crossref_primary_10_1258_mi_2010_010022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anuro_2007_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1783_147118907779399828
crossref_primary_10_3109_01443615_2012_731455
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0957_5847_97_80079_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2009_09_022
crossref_primary_10_3310_hta19670
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443610500235170
crossref_primary_10_1097_00006254_199901000_00025
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11884_017_0442_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2004_01_031
crossref_primary_10_1177_146642400312300404
crossref_primary_10_14260_Jemds_2017_609
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09909.x
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
ExternalDocumentID 8813310
Genre Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID --K
.55
.GA
.GJ
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
1~5
23N
3O-
4G.
51W
51X
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52W
52X
53G
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6J9
7-5
7PT
8-1
930
A01
A03
AAEDT
AAEVG
AAIKC
AALRI
AAMNW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABJNI
ACBWZ
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACXQS
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADMGS
ADMUD
AEIMD
AEUQT
AFFNX
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFTJW
AI.
AIURR
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMBMR
BDRZF
BY8
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
LP6
LP7
M41
NEJ
NPM
NQ-
O9-
OZT
P4B
P4D
QB0
R2-
ROL
RPZ
RWI
SSZ
SUPJJ
UHS
VH1
WH7
WIH
WIJ
WQJ
WUP
WXI
X7M
XG1
XV2
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3988-bbcb05575913fcae6c5993ef6f88f4ab8b88d32d76a8ddb78f04b27a80b7fdd32
ISSN 0306-5456
IngestDate Sat Sep 28 08:37:46 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3988-bbcb05575913fcae6c5993ef6f88f4ab8b88d32d76a8ddb78f04b27a80b7fdd32
PMID 8813310
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_8813310
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate September 1996
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1996-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 1996
  text: September 1996
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
PublicationTitleAlternate Br J Obstet Gynaecol
PublicationYear 1996
References Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996 Dec;103(12):1273
References_xml
SSID ssj0007764
Score 1.7855581
Snippet To test the hypothesis that at two years bladder and ovarian function function are no different following either simple hysterectomy or endometrial ablation...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 898
SubjectTerms Adult
Climacteric
Cohort Studies
Endometrium - surgery
Estrogen Replacement Therapy
Female
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - blood
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hysterectomy - adverse effects
Laser Therapy - adverse effects
Ovarian Diseases - etiology
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Diseases - etiology
Urinary Incontinence - etiology
Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery
Title A comparison of bladder and ovarian function two years following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8813310
Volume 103
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LaxsxEBZ2S0supa_QNzr0Zhb2Ia-0RzdxycWl0BR6C3o2AWcVErfB_74zq_F6bUhoD70siwTC1vftSBrm-8TYx1oF2VhhMquVy0QVTNZ4UWXChjDVhRZlgdrhk2_yyw91PBfz0WhzA-G27b8iDW2ANSpn_wHtflBogHfAHJ6AOjz_CvcZlZXT1YITs8TYkiol429ox6wGLGYd7qvbOFnDDKApw3IZbzFvcI7ezhgHIwpNrie-dfHSp9s9tFlukdyzRRp4UEQDQ6D1fzKA_rlutbc7-ftP53q10ij5WuudBOwCTcJJBdansL9etBdxN1GLau1kf3BMYgpHWr66r83qJVt5neEWbicc59WAd80guKp0X_U9QV8WWT4tFUowa8x5w1LbpHLQAfJXlx30SsHxPJXU3tu5Z8dNPWM2hr0Vbr-PFv3KLyXZldHfIpNbqhy749cdsEc05t7JptvhnD5lT-howmeJU8_YyLfP2eMFFV-8YH7Gt9TiMXCiFgeMOVGLb6jFgVq8oxbvqcWH1OLxmg-oxTfUesm-f56fHp1kdEtHZqsGPj5jrEEjt2lTVMFqX9sp7Hl9qINSQWijjFKuKp2sIRo4I1XIhSmlVrmRwUHPIXvQxta_Ytw32uTWlyiQFj6oJlQOBi5lURkrcvuaHaYJOrtKVixnNHNv7up4yw62xHvHHgb4yv17Nr5xvz502P0BbJF06A
link.rule.ids 782
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparison+of+bladder+and+ovarian+function+two+years+following+hysterectomy+or+endometrial+ablation&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+obstetrics+and+gynaecology&rft.au=Bhattacharya%2C+S&rft.au=Mollison%2C+J&rft.au=Pinion%2C+S&rft.au=Parkin%2C+D+E&rft.date=1996-09-01&rft.issn=0306-5456&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.1996.tb09909.x&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F8813310&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F8813310&rft.externalDocID=8813310
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0306-5456&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0306-5456&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0306-5456&client=summon