Metabolic Costs of Standing and Walking in Healthy Military-Age Adults: A Meta-regression

INTRODUCTIONThe Load Carriage Decision Aid (LCDA) is a U.S. Army planning tool that predicts physiological responses of soldiers during different dismounted troop scenarios. We aimed to develop an equation that calculates standing and walking metabolic rates in healthy military-age adults for the LC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 346 - 351
Main Authors: LOONEY, DAVID P, POTTER, ADAM W, PRYOR, J LUKE, BREMNER, PATRICIA E, CHALMERS, CHRISTOPHER R, MCCLUNG, HOLLY L, WELLES, ALEXANDER P, SANTEE, WILLIAM R
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States American College of Sports Medicine 01-02-2019
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:INTRODUCTIONThe Load Carriage Decision Aid (LCDA) is a U.S. Army planning tool that predicts physiological responses of soldiers during different dismounted troop scenarios. We aimed to develop an equation that calculates standing and walking metabolic rates in healthy military-age adults for the LCDA using a meta-regression. METHODSWe searched for studies that measured the energetic cost of standing and treadmill walking in healthy men and women via indirect calorimetry. We used mixed effects meta-regression to determine an optimal equation to calculate standing and walking metabolic rates as a function of walking speed (S, m·s). The optimal equation was used to determine the economical speed at which the metabolic cost per distance walked is minimized. The estimation precision of the new LCDA walking equation was compared with that of seven reference predictive equations. RESULTSThe meta-regression included 48 studies. The optimal equation for calculating normal standing and walking metabolic rates (W·kg) was 1.44 + 1.94S + 0.24S. The economical speed for level walking was 1.39 m·s (~ 3.1 mph). The LCDA walking equation was more precise across all walking speeds (bias ± SD, 0.01 ± 0.33 W·kg) than the reference predictive equations. CONCLUSIONPractitioners can use the new LCDA walking equation to calculate energy expenditure during standing and walking at speeds <2 m·s in healthy, military-age adults. The LCDA walking equation avoids the errors estimated by other equations at lower and higher walking speeds.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001779