Nondegradable hydrogels for the treatment of focal cartilage defects

Nondegradable materials have long been suggested for the treatment of articular cartilage defects; however, the mechanics of the implant/tissue system necessary to ensure long‐term function are unknown. The objective of this study was to explore the performance of nondegradable hydrogel implants in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A Vol. 83A; no. 1; pp. 145 - 155
Main Authors: Maher, S.A., Doty, S.B., Torzilli, P.A., Thornton, S., Lowman, A.M., Thomas, J.D., Warren, R., Wright, T.M., Myers, E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-10-2007
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nondegradable materials have long been suggested for the treatment of articular cartilage defects; however, the mechanics of the implant/tissue system necessary to ensure long‐term function are unknown. The objective of this study was to explore the performance of nondegradable hydrogel implants in cartilage defects. Our hypothesis was that the structural integrity of the implant and surrounding tissue would be influenced by the compressive modulus of the material used, and that superior results would be obtained with the implantation of a more compliant material. Poly(vinyl alcohol)–poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) hydrogel implants of two different moduli were implanted into osteochondral defects in a rabbit model. Six‐month postoperative histological and mechanical data were used to assess the wear and fixation of the implants. The compliant implants remained well fixed and a thin layer of soft tissue grew over the surface of the implants. However, gross deformation of the compliant implants occurred and debris was evident in surrounding bone. The stiffer implants were dislocated from their implantation site, but with no accompanying evidence of debris or implant deformation. Our hypothesis that superior results would be obtained with implantation of a more compliant material was rejected; a compromise between the wear and fixation properties dependent on modulus was found. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2007
Bibliography:National Center for Research Resources
Clark Foundation
ark:/67375/WNG-6S4QW6H3-6
National Institutes of Health - No. C06-RR12538-01
Core Center for Skeletal Integrity - No. 5P30AR046121
Kirby Foundation
ArticleID:JBM31255
istex:D5F0FDC09F998E2A55C605270AFA628BB3BFB94B
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1549-3296
1552-4965
DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.31255