On the Origins of Phenotypic Parallelism in Benthic and Limnetic Stickleback

Abstract Rapid evolution of similar phenotypes in similar environments, giving rise to in situ parallel adaptation, is an important hallmark of ecological speciation. However, what appears to be in situ adaptation can also arise by dispersal of divergent lineages from elsewhere. We test whether two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular biology and evolution Vol. 40; no. 9
Main Authors: Dean, Laura L, Magalhaes, Isabel Santos, D’Agostino, Daniele, Hohenlohe, Paul, MacColl, Andrew D C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: US Oxford University Press 01-09-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Rapid evolution of similar phenotypes in similar environments, giving rise to in situ parallel adaptation, is an important hallmark of ecological speciation. However, what appears to be in situ adaptation can also arise by dispersal of divergent lineages from elsewhere. We test whether two contrasting phenotypes repeatedly evolved in parallel, or have a single origin, in an archetypal example of ecological adaptive radiation: benthic–limnetic three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) across species pair and solitary lakes in British Columbia. We identify two genomic clusters across freshwater populations, which differ in benthic–limnetic divergent phenotypic traits and separate benthic from limnetic individuals in species pair lakes. Phylogenetic reconstruction and niche evolution modeling both suggest a single evolutionary origin for each of these clusters. We detected strong phylogenetic signal in benthic–limnetic divergent traits, suggesting that they are ancestrally retained. Accounting for ancestral state retention, we identify local adaptation of body armor due to the presence of an intraguild predator, the sculpin (Cottus asper), and environmental effects of lake depth and pH on body size. Taken together, our results imply a predominant role for retention of ancestral characteristics in driving trait distribution, with further selection imposed on some traits by environmental factors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0737-4038
1537-1719
DOI:10.1093/molbev/msad191