Comprehensive Comparison of Continuous-Wave and Linear-Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave Radars for Short-Range Vital Sign Monitoring

The use of radar technology for contactless monitoring of cardiorespiratory activity has been a significant research topic for the last two decades. However, despite the abundant literature focusing on the use of different radar architectures for healthcare applications, an in-depth analysis is miss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 229 - 245
Main Authors: Antolinos, Elias, Grajal, Jesus
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States IEEE 01-04-2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of radar technology for contactless monitoring of cardiorespiratory activity has been a significant research topic for the last two decades. However, despite the abundant literature focusing on the use of different radar architectures for healthcare applications, an in-depth analysis is missing about the most appropriate configuration. This article presents a comparison between continuous-wave (CW) and linear-frequency-modulated continuous-wave (LFMCW) radars for application in vital sign monitoring scenarios. These waveforms are generated with the same architecture at two different frequencies: 24 and 134 GHz. Results evidence that both configurations are capable of measuring general metrics, such as the breathing and heart rates. However, LFMCW offers better results in the identification of cardiac events and the extraction of certain derived biomarkers, such as the heart rate variability sequences (HRV). Conclusions show that this performance does not depend on the selected working frequency.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1932-4545
1940-9990
DOI:10.1109/TBCAS.2023.3257647