Observation versus neck dissection for positron-emission tomography-negative lymphadenopathy after chemoradiotherapy

Objectives/Hypothesis To analyze outcomes among patients with residual positron‐emission tomography (PET)‐negative lymphadenopathy after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer based on whether or not they underwent neck dissection. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods Fifty‐five patients w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope Vol. 124; no. 4; pp. 902 - 906
Main Authors: Khodayari, Behnood, Daly, Megan E., Bobinski, Matthew, Farwell, D. Gregory, Shelton, David K., Chen, Allen M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-04-2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives/Hypothesis To analyze outcomes among patients with residual positron‐emission tomography (PET)‐negative lymphadenopathy after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer based on whether or not they underwent neck dissection. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods Fifty‐five patients with stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were identified with residual PET‐negative lymphadenopathy based on standardized uptake value of <3. All patients had been treated with chemoradiotherapy to a median dose of 70 Gy (range, 60–4 Gy). Results With a median follow‐up of 30 months (range, 6–67 months), the 3‐year overall survival (85% vs. 81%, P = .57), progression‐free survival (88% vs. 88%, P = .42), and local‐regional control (96% vs. 100%, P = .68), did not differ between patients treated by neck dissection or observation. Conclusions Omission of neck dissection appears to be reasonable for patients with residual lymphadenopathy but negative PET after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 124:902–906, 2014
Bibliography:istex:0B073EF064FB993DBF9525E36F9ABFF51EEF952B
ark:/67375/WNG-GG6DVVFZ-R
ArticleID:LARY24411
Presented at the Cancer Imaging and Radiation Therapy Symposium, American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Orlando, Florida, U.S.A., February 8–9, 2013.
The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.24411