Observation versus neck dissection for positron-emission tomography-negative lymphadenopathy after chemoradiotherapy
Objectives/Hypothesis To analyze outcomes among patients with residual positron‐emission tomography (PET)‐negative lymphadenopathy after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer based on whether or not they underwent neck dissection. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods Fifty‐five patients w...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Laryngoscope Vol. 124; no. 4; pp. 902 - 906 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-04-2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives/Hypothesis
To analyze outcomes among patients with residual positron‐emission tomography (PET)‐negative lymphadenopathy after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer based on whether or not they underwent neck dissection.
Study Design
Retrospective review.
Methods
Fifty‐five patients with stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were identified with residual PET‐negative lymphadenopathy based on standardized uptake value of <3. All patients had been treated with chemoradiotherapy to a median dose of 70 Gy (range, 60–4 Gy).
Results
With a median follow‐up of 30 months (range, 6–67 months), the 3‐year overall survival (85% vs. 81%, P = .57), progression‐free survival (88% vs. 88%, P = .42), and local‐regional control (96% vs. 100%, P = .68), did not differ between patients treated by neck dissection or observation.
Conclusions
Omission of neck dissection appears to be reasonable for patients with residual lymphadenopathy but negative PET after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Level of Evidence
4. Laryngoscope, 124:902–906, 2014 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:0B073EF064FB993DBF9525E36F9ABFF51EEF952B ark:/67375/WNG-GG6DVVFZ-R ArticleID:LARY24411 Presented at the Cancer Imaging and Radiation Therapy Symposium, American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Orlando, Florida, U.S.A., February 8–9, 2013. The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
DOI: | 10.1002/lary.24411 |