Assessment of an electronic system for research ethics committees document management: An observational study

• Published in: Accountability in research Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 21 - 33
• Main Authors: Mariani, Javier, Garau, Laura, Ferrero, Fernando, Vukotich, Claudia, Roitman, Adriel J, Serrano, Cecilia M, Perelis, Leonardo, Domínguez, Adriana G, González Villa Monte, Gabriel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Taylor & Francis 2023; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Biomedical Research; Electronic submission system; Electronic systems; Ethics; Ethics Committees, Research; Filing - methods; health research applications; Humans; Medical research; Observational studies; Research ethics; research ethics committee network; health research applications; research ethics committee network; Electronic submission system
• ISSN: 0898-9621; 1545-5815
• DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1960515

Since 1 January 2020, the Central Research Ethics Committee of the Health Ministry implemented PRIISA.BA, an in-house developed electronic system for online submission of health research applications to the 63 public and private research ethics committees (RECs) of Buenos Aires City, Argentina. This study though to compare the times to first review and the time to approval among applications submitted prior to PRIISA.BA and thereafter, across public RECs. All public RECs of the city were invited to participate. Overall, 453 applications from 10 RECs (242 pre- and 211 post-PRIISA.BA) were available for the analyses. There was a decrease in the time to first review and an increase in the time to approval after PRIISA.BA implementation. The increase in time to approval was transient and limited to the first three months. The results were consistent with analyses limited to non-COVID applications. Our results show an increase in the times to approval after the implementation of an electronic system for online submission of health research applications that, although transient, was significant. These data could be relevant to other RECs implementing this technology since it emphasizes the need of monitoring potential unnecessary delays in reviews during the critical initial period.