Knowledge and agency in interprofessional care: How nurses contribute to the case-construction in an Intensive Care Unit

This paper focuses on the epistemic and interactional resources displayed by nurses participating in medical case construction and the ways through which they make a difference in the unfolding of this activity. This paper draws on an ethnographic research in an Italian Intensive Care Unit (ICU) sel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of interprofessional care Vol. 32; no. 5; pp. 592 - 602
Main Authors: Caronia, Letizia, Saglietti, Marzia
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Taylor & Francis 03-09-2018
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper focuses on the epistemic and interactional resources displayed by nurses participating in medical case construction and the ways through which they make a difference in the unfolding of this activity. This paper draws on an ethnographic research in an Italian Intensive Care Unit (ICU) selected according to a purposeful sampling approach out of a national sample of 40 ICUs participating in a larger research project. Our dataset, collected over a period of six months of ethnographic observations, consisted of the observers' field notes and log-books, audio and video-recordings of morning briefings, in-depth interviews, informal conversations and shadowing of bedside practices. For the purpose of this article, we analyzed the video-recorded morning briefings, involving nine attending physicians and three specialized nurses. Adopting a conversational analysis approach, this paper identifies the epistemic activities through which the nurses orient the physicians' ongoing reasoning. It illustrates how the nurses' contributions display different degrees of agency depending on the type of activity, the turn taking and the turn design. We contend that the nurses' interactional competence in managing their epistemic resources and rights related to their professional territory of knowledge makes their knowledge relevant and contributes in constituting the case construction as an interprofessional activity. Implications, limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1356-1820
1469-9567
DOI:10.1080/13561820.2018.1463199