Electro activation of persulfate using iron sheet as low-cost electrode: the role of the operating conditions

This work assesses the role of the operational conditions upon the electro-activation of persulfate (PS) using sacrificed iron electrode as a continuous low-cost Fe 2+ source. An aqueous phenol solution (100 mg L −1 ) was selected as model effluent. The studied variables include current density (1-1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental technology Vol. 39; no. 9; pp. 1208 - 1216
Main Authors: Silveira, Jefferson E., Cardoso, Tais O., Barreto-Rodrigues, Marcio, Zazo, Juan A., Casas, José A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Taylor & Francis 03-05-2018
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This work assesses the role of the operational conditions upon the electro-activation of persulfate (PS) using sacrificed iron electrode as a continuous low-cost Fe 2+ source. An aqueous phenol solution (100 mg L −1 ) was selected as model effluent. The studied variables include current density (1-10 mA cm −2 ), persulfate concentration (0.7-2.85 g L −1 ), temperature (30-90°C) and the solution conductivity (2.7-20.7 mS cm −1 ) using Na 2 SO 4 and NaCl as supporting electrolyte. A mineralization degree of around 80% with Na 2 SO 4 and 92% in presence of NaCl was achieved at 30°C using 2.15 g L −1 PS at the lowest current density tested (1 mA cm −2 ). Besides PS concentration, temperature was the main variable affecting the process. In the range of 30-70°C, it showed a positive effect, achieving TOC conversion above 95% (using Na 2 SO 4 under the previous conditions) along with a significant increase in iron sludge, which adversely affects the economy of the process. A lumped and simplified kinetic model based on persulfate consumption and TOC mineralization is suggested. The activation energy obtained for the TOC decay was 29 kJ mol −1 . An estimated operating cost of US$ 3.00 per m 3 was obtained, demonstrating the economic feasibility of this process.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0959-3330
1479-487X
DOI:10.1080/09593330.2017.1323960