Camera trap surveys to evaluate pest animal control operations

Many camera trap surveys aiming to detect the effects of management actions on pest animal populations are not as useful as they could be, because they do not produce informative results. We used mixed effects models, signed ranks tests and occupancy models to examine changes in the activity and occ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological management & restoration Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 97 - 100
Main Authors: Bengsen, Andrew, Robinson, Rhett, Chaffey, Cameron, Gavenlock, Jason, Hornsby, Vanessa, Hurst, Rob, Fosdick, Mark
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Canberra Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many camera trap surveys aiming to detect the effects of management actions on pest animal populations are not as useful as they could be, because they do not produce informative results. We used mixed effects models, signed ranks tests and occupancy models to examine changes in the activity and occurrence of European red fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) in areas subjected to repeated fox management operations. In agricultural land, mixed effects models identified a decline in fox activity after baiting in 1 year, but not the next. Occupancy models revealed a decrease in fox occurrence in a National Park following control operations. These methods, combined with appropriate survey designs, could greatly enhance the value of many pest animal surveys conducted by management agencies.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emr.12086
ark:/67375/WNG-L20F99F7-4
Data S1. Further details on GLMM and occupancy implementation.Data S2. Procedure for applying the Wilcoxon signed ranks test.
ArticleID:EMR12086
istex:0D6A637D6F0168F6294AE51D9896FCF6F07501A2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1442-7001
1839-3330
1442-8903
DOI:10.1111/emr.12086