Nest boxes in planted and regrowth Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.) ecosystems
Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological management & restoration Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 153 - 155 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Canberra
Blackwell Science [for] Ecological Society of Australia
01-05-2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10‐year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10‐year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects. Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red-gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10-year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects. Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum ( Eucalyptus tereticornis ) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10‐year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects. Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10‐year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects. |
Author | Franks, Stacey Franks, Alan Hogan, Luke D. Smith, Geoffrey C. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Smith, Geoffrey C – sequence: 2 fullname: Hogan, Luke D – sequence: 3 fullname: Franks, Alan – sequence: 4 fullname: Franks, Stacey |
BookMark | eNp1kctO3EAQRVsRSOG1yBfQUjaw8NBv28sIBiYSEIlHkCKkVrtdnpjY7qHbFjO7fALfyJfQYJIFErWpWpxbunVrE611rgOEvlAyobEOoPUTyqhUn9AGzXiecM7JWpyFYElKCP2MNkO4i0PKVb6Bbs8h9LhwSwi47vCiMV0PJTZdiT3MvXvof-Nj51-gCyif_j7OhxbvTQdrmtWiHwLuwUNfW-e7OuDLdrKPwbqwCj20YRutV6YJsPPWt9D18fTqcJac_jj5fvjtNLE8ZyopuDQFYWVKIStUJkhqQKQVF5URBRAhpLQFKzKSgeKcVZYKlgtJhSKl5RXhW2hv3Lvw7n6IXnVbBwtNPAbcEDRNJWVEpjyN6Nd36J0bfBfdaaoyygThLI_U_khZ70LwUOmFr1vjV5oS_ZKzjjnr15wjezCyD3UDq49BPT27-KdIRkUdU1r-Vxj_R6voUeqb8xN99HNGjsSvG51FfnfkK-O0mfs66OtLRqiMX8yEkoI_A5b1mJo |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12269 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12316 crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12332 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.016 10.1071/PC120263 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.012 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.026 10.1071/WR06174 10.1071/ZO12117 10.1046/j.1442-8903.2002.00088.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 State of Queensland Ecological Management & Restoration © 2015 Ecological Society of Australia and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd Ecological Management & Restoration © 2015 Ecological Society of Australia. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 State of Queensland Ecological Management & Restoration © 2015 Ecological Society of Australia and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd – notice: Ecological Management & Restoration © 2015 Ecological Society of Australia. |
DBID | FBQ BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7ST 7T7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 SOI 7U6 |
DOI | 10.1111/emr.12156 |
DatabaseName | AGRIS Istex CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Sustainability Science Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Technology Research Database Ecology Abstracts CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Ecology |
EISSN | 1839-3330 1442-8903 |
EndPage | 155 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3687150551 10_1111_emr_12156 EMR12156 ark_67375_WNG_DVH0D4ZW_8 US201500184654 |
Genre | shortCommunication |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Queensland Government – fundername: GAWB |
GroupedDBID | .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 29G 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 4P2 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABHUG ABJNI ABPTK ABPVW ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG COF D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EAD EAP EBD EBS EDH EJD EMK ESX F00 F01 F04 FBQ FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 ML. MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- P2P P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ TUS UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHBH AHBTC AITYG BSCLL HGLYW OIG AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7ST 7T7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 SOI 7U6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3926-b35ab02d71e8b68407ae47f34fa4be04455cb2b808e6332fc1429451460dc3f03 |
IEDL.DBID | 33P |
ISSN | 1442-7001 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 10:07:17 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 18:24:36 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 04:09:10 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:54:35 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:51:58 EDT 2024 Wed Dec 27 19:10:12 EST 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3926-b35ab02d71e8b68407ae47f34fa4be04455cb2b808e6332fc1429451460dc3f03 |
Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emr.12156 Queensland Government istex:80BD83E1C65A8032C03C128DA9022E381B24045E ArticleID:EMR12156 ark:/67375/WNG-DVH0D4ZW-8 GAWB ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1681240329 |
PQPubID | 29004 |
PageCount | 3 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1751205737 proquest_journals_1681240329 crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12156 wiley_primary_10_1111_emr_12156_EMR12156 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_DVH0D4ZW_8 fao_agris_US201500184654 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | May 2015 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2015 text: May 2015 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Canberra |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Canberra |
PublicationTitle | Ecological management & restoration |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ecol Manag Restor |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Blackwell Science [for] Ecological Society of Australia Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Science [for] Ecological Society of Australia – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
References | Goldingay R. L., Grimson M. J. and Smith G. C. (2007) Do feathertail gliders show a preference for nest box design? Wildlife Research 34, 484-490. Law B. S. and Chidel M. (2006) Eucalypt plantings on farms: Use by insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 133, 236-249. Lewis T., Taylor D., Swift S. and Debuse V. (2012) Factors influencing early restoration progress of a Eucalyptus tereticornis open forest on former agricultural land. Pacific Conservation Biology 18, 263-281. Bowen M. E., McAlpine C. A., House A. P. N. and Smith G. C. (2007) Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: A review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna. Biological Conservation 140, 273-296. Lindenmayer D. B., Welsh A., Donnelly C. et al. (2009) Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition. Biological Conservation 142, 33-42. Smith G. C. and Agnew G. (2002) The value of 'bat boxes' for attracting hollow-dependent fauna to farm forestry plantations in southeast Queensland. Ecological Management and Restoration 3, 37-46. Van Dyck S., Gynther I. and Baker A. (2013) Field Companion to the Mammals of Australia. New Holland Publishers, Sydney. Eyre T. J., Kelly A. L., Neldner V. J. et al. (2011) BioCondition: A Condition Assessment Framework for Terrestrial Biodiversity in Queensland. Assessment Manual. Version 2.1. Queensland Herbarium, DSITIA, Brisbane, Qld. Rueegger N. N., Goldingay R. L. and Brookes L. O. (2012) Does nest box design influence use by the eastern pygmy possum? Australian Journal of Zoology 60, 372-380. Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. (1981) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. 2012; 60 2002; 3 2012; 18 1981 2009; 142 2013 2007; 140 2011 2007; 34 2006; 133 e_1_2_6_9_1 Sokal R. R. (e_1_2_6_10_1) 1981 Van Dyck S. (e_1_2_6_11_1) 2013 e_1_2_6_8_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 Eyre T. J. (e_1_2_6_3_1) 2011 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 e_1_2_6_6_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 |
References_xml | – year: 2011 – volume: 60 start-page: 372 year: 2012 end-page: 380 article-title: Does nest box design influence use by the eastern pygmy possum? publication-title: Australian Journal of Zoology – volume: 133 start-page: 236 year: 2006 end-page: 249 article-title: Eucalypt plantings on farms: Use by insectivorous bats in south‐eastern Australia publication-title: Biological Conservation – year: 1981 – volume: 18 start-page: 263 year: 2012 end-page: 281 article-title: Factors influencing early restoration progress of a open forest on former agricultural land publication-title: Pacific Conservation Biology – volume: 3 start-page: 37 year: 2002 end-page: 46 article-title: The value of ‘bat boxes’ for attracting hollow‐dependent fauna to farm forestry plantations in southeast Queensland publication-title: Ecological Management and Restoration – volume: 140 start-page: 273 year: 2007 end-page: 296 article-title: Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: A review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 34 start-page: 484 year: 2007 end-page: 490 article-title: Do feathertail gliders show a preference for nest box design? publication-title: Wildlife Research – volume: 142 start-page: 33 year: 2009 end-page: 42 article-title: Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow‐dependent animals? Long‐term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition publication-title: Biological Conservation – year: 2013 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.016 – volume-title: BioCondition: A Condition Assessment Framework for Terrestrial Biodiversity in Queensland. Assessment Manual year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 contributor: fullname: Eyre T. J. – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1071/PC120263 – volume-title: Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research year: 1981 ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 contributor: fullname: Sokal R. R. – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.012 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.026 – volume-title: Field Companion to the Mammals of Australia year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 contributor: fullname: Van Dyck S. – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1071/WR06174 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.1071/ZO12117 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1442-8903.2002.00088.x |
SSID | ssj0017369 |
Score | 2.0667813 |
Snippet | Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)... Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)... Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum ( Eucalyptus tereticornis )... Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red-gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)... Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red-gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley istex fao |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 153 |
SubjectTerms | agricultural land Animal behavior artificial hollows birds breeding Ecosystems Eucalyptus tereticornis fauna forests habitats land restoration nest boxes offsets planting Reforestation regrowth reptiles surveys terrestrial vertebrate Trees |
Title | Nest boxes in planted and regrowth Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.) ecosystems |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-DVH0D4ZW-8/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Femr.12156 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1681240329 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1751205737 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NatwwEB6aQKGX_pe4SYtaSkkPLrYlW156Cl2ne-lSsk1TSkFIlrwJyXqX9RqSWx-hz9gnyYy8a5JDodCbjSVsz2g030iabwDemDxNSxmnoR1YGwots3BQRSYk3hjn0CPGmtZ0RxM5_p4PC6LJ-bDJhen4IfoFN7IMP1-TgWvT3DByN1t6agSi28Yowadv8C_9DoLkvpwdxguIIPF-zSpEp3j6nrd80Val54hQSbiXt-DmTdDqvc7hg__63odwfw022UE3Oh7BHVc_hruFJ6q-egI_x_hmZuaXrmFnNVtckJQt07VlSzfF-Hx1yqh0JzY6cvbPr9_Tdsb2C-KuvVqs2oahTigHklK7GjaZvX_HMJjtuKGbp3B8WHz9OArX1RbCEjFSFhqeahMlVsYuN0QBI7UTsuKi0sK4SAhUqklMHuUu4zypyhhdmUC8lUW25FXEn8F2Pa_dDrAq5qlJrZMJLwUVLhRVokU5iIXWwmoewOuN3NWiI9VQm2AExaS8mALYQY0oPcXJTh1PElqaiTAezVIRwFuvpr6zXp7TATWZqpPxJzX8NoqG4seJygPY2-hRrW2zUTFRromIJ4MAXvWP0apoq0TXbt5iG4lAiLgiZQD7Xqt__1BVfD7yF8__veku3KMf6k5O7sH2atm6F7DV2PalH8bXhODwrQ |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,1408,27935,27936,46066,46490 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fi9QwEB_cE9EX_8tVT40icj5U2iZtWvBF3J4r3i1ye-eJCCFt0lV0u8t2C3dvfgQ_o5_EmXS33D0Igm8tTWg7k8n8ZpL8BuBZkcZxKcPYN5kxvtAy8bMqKHzijbEWPWKoKac7msjxp3SYE03Oq81ZmI4fok-4kWW4-ZoMnBLS56zczpaOGyEZwGWRiIwKN3D-oV9DkNwVtMOIATEk3q95hWgfT9_1gjcaVHqOGJXEe3oBcJ6Hrc7v7N34vy--CdfXeJO97gbILbhk69twJXdc1Wd34MsYX82K-alt2LeaLX6QoA3TtWFLO8UQffWVUfVObHRoze-fv6btjO3mRF97tli1DUO10DFIOt3VsMns5QuG8WxHD93cheO9_OjNyF8XXPBLhEmJX_BYF0FkZGjTglhgpLZCVlxUWhQ2EAL1WkRFGqQ24TyqyhC9mUDIlQSm5FXA78FWPa_tNrAq5HERGysjXgqqXSiqSIsyC4XWwmjuwdON4NWi49VQm3gExaScmDzYRpUoPcX5Th1PIsrOBBiSJrHw4LnTU99ZL7_THjUZq5PxWzX8OAqG4vOJSj3Y2ShSrc2zUSGxromAR5kHT_rHaFi0WqJrO2-xjUQsRHSR0oNdp9a_f6jKDw7dxf1_b_oYro6ODvbV_rvx-wdwjX6u20i5A1urZWsfwqAx7SM3pv8AsE30zg |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fi9QwEB_cE8UX_8tVT40icj5U2iZtuvgkbtcVdTluPU9ECEmTrqLbXba7cPfmR_Az-kmcSXfL3YMg-NbShLYzmcxvksxvAJ6YPE1LGaeh7VsbCi2zsF9FJiTeGOfQI8aa1nRHEzn-lA8Kosl5sc2FafkhugU3sgw_X5OBL2x1xsjdbOmpEbIeXBQEwyl_gx90WwiS-3p2GDAghMT7Da0QHePpup5zRr1KzxGiknRPzuHNs6jVu53htf_64OtwdYM22ct2eNyAC66-CZcKz1R9egu-jPHNzMxPXMO-1Wzxg8Rsma4tW7opBuirr4xqd2KjQ2d___w1Xc_YfkHktaeL1bphqBRKgqTcroZNZs-fMYxmW3Lo5jYcDYsPr0bhptxCWCJIykLDU22ixMrY5YY4YKR2QlZcVFoYFwmBWjWJyaPcZZwnVRmjLxMIuLLIlryK-B3Yqee12wVWxTw1qXUy4aWgyoWiSrQo-7HQWljNA3i8lbtatKwaahuNoJiUF1MAu6gRpac426mjSUJrMxEGpFkqAnjq1dR11svvdEJNpup4_FoNPo6igfh8rPIA9rZ6VBvjbFRMnGsi4kk_gEfdYzQr2ivRtZuvsY1EJERkkTKAfa_Vv3-oKt4f-ou7_970IVw-GAzVuzfjt_fgCv1be4pyD3ZWy7W7D73Grh_4Ef0H0jDzfQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nest+boxes+in+planted+and+regrowth+Forest+Red%E2%80%90gum+%28Eucalyptus+tereticornis+Sm.%29+ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Ecological+management+%26+restoration&rft.au=Smith%2C+Geoffrey+C.&rft.au=Hogan%2C+Luke+D.&rft.au=Franks%2C+Alan&rft.au=Franks%2C+Stacey&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.issn=1442-7001&rft.eissn=1442-8903&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Femr.12156&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Femr.12156&rft.externalDocID=EMR12156 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1442-7001&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1442-7001&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1442-7001&client=summon |