Nest boxes in planted and regrowth Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.) ecosystems

Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological management & restoration Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 153 - 155
Main Authors: Smith, Geoffrey C, Hogan, Luke D, Franks, Alan, Franks, Stacey
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Canberra Blackwell Science [for] Ecological Society of Australia 01-05-2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10‐year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects.
AbstractList Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10‐year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects.
Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red-gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10-year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects.
Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum ( Eucalyptus tereticornis ) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10‐year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects.
Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) ecosystems on abandoned former agricultural land. A year after revegetation began, 36 boxes were installed in each of the planted and regrowth areas in 2003, and these were monitored to 2013. Sixteen vertebrate species utilised boxes, which included breeding by four species and two species that were not detected by other survey methods. More boxes were used by fauna in the planting compared to regrowth in all but one audit. Significantly, more boxes were used by reptiles in regrowth than planting, but significantly more by birds in planting than regrowth. Nearly 90 per cent of boxes remained intact over the 10‐year period. While the study's capacity to attribute results to habitat types was limited, the results do add weight to the possibility that nest boxes made of good quality materials can provide valuable habitat for a wide range of species during the early recovery phase of reforestation projects.
Author Franks, Stacey
Franks, Alan
Hogan, Luke D.
Smith, Geoffrey C.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Smith, Geoffrey C
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Hogan, Luke D
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Franks, Alan
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Franks, Stacey
BookMark eNp1kctO3EAQRVsRSOG1yBfQUjaw8NBv28sIBiYSEIlHkCKkVrtdnpjY7qHbFjO7fALfyJfQYJIFErWpWpxbunVrE611rgOEvlAyobEOoPUTyqhUn9AGzXiecM7JWpyFYElKCP2MNkO4i0PKVb6Bbs8h9LhwSwi47vCiMV0PJTZdiT3MvXvof-Nj51-gCyif_j7OhxbvTQdrmtWiHwLuwUNfW-e7OuDLdrKPwbqwCj20YRutV6YJsPPWt9D18fTqcJac_jj5fvjtNLE8ZyopuDQFYWVKIStUJkhqQKQVF5URBRAhpLQFKzKSgeKcVZYKlgtJhSKl5RXhW2hv3Lvw7n6IXnVbBwtNPAbcEDRNJWVEpjyN6Nd36J0bfBfdaaoyygThLI_U_khZ70LwUOmFr1vjV5oS_ZKzjjnr15wjezCyD3UDq49BPT27-KdIRkUdU1r-Vxj_R6voUeqb8xN99HNGjsSvG51FfnfkK-O0mfs66OtLRqiMX8yEkoI_A5b1mJo
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12269
crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12316
crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12332
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.016
10.1071/PC120263
10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.012
10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.026
10.1071/WR06174
10.1071/ZO12117
10.1046/j.1442-8903.2002.00088.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 State of Queensland Ecological Management & Restoration © 2015 Ecological Society of Australia and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Ecological Management & Restoration © 2015 Ecological Society of Australia.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 State of Queensland Ecological Management & Restoration © 2015 Ecological Society of Australia and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
– notice: Ecological Management & Restoration © 2015 Ecological Society of Australia.
DBID FBQ
BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
7SN
7ST
7T7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
SOI
7U6
DOI 10.1111/emr.12156
DatabaseName AGRIS
Istex
CrossRef
Ecology Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Environment Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Sustainability Science Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList
Technology Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
CrossRef

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Ecology
EISSN 1839-3330
1442-8903
EndPage 155
ExternalDocumentID 3687150551
10_1111_emr_12156
EMR12156
ark_67375_WNG_DVH0D4ZW_8
US201500184654
Genre shortCommunication
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Queensland Government
– fundername: GAWB
GroupedDBID .3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
29G
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
4P2
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABHUG
ABJNI
ABPTK
ABPVW
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXME
ACXQS
ADAWD
ADBBV
ADDAD
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFVGU
AFZJQ
AGJLS
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
COF
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EAD
EAP
EBD
EBS
EDH
EJD
EMK
ESX
F00
F01
F04
FBQ
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
ML.
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TUS
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
ZZTAW
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAHBH
AHBTC
AITYG
BSCLL
HGLYW
OIG
AAYXX
CITATION
7SN
7ST
7T7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
SOI
7U6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3926-b35ab02d71e8b68407ae47f34fa4be04455cb2b808e6332fc1429451460dc3f03
IEDL.DBID 33P
ISSN 1442-7001
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 10:07:17 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 18:24:36 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 04:09:10 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:54:35 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 30 09:51:58 EDT 2024
Wed Dec 27 19:10:12 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3926-b35ab02d71e8b68407ae47f34fa4be04455cb2b808e6332fc1429451460dc3f03
Notes http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emr.12156
Queensland Government
istex:80BD83E1C65A8032C03C128DA9022E381B24045E
ArticleID:EMR12156
ark:/67375/WNG-DVH0D4ZW-8
GAWB
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 1681240329
PQPubID 29004
PageCount 3
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1751205737
proquest_journals_1681240329
crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12156
wiley_primary_10_1111_emr_12156_EMR12156
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_DVH0D4ZW_8
fao_agris_US201500184654
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate May 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2015
  text: May 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Canberra
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Canberra
PublicationTitle Ecological management & restoration
PublicationTitleAlternate Ecol Manag Restor
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Blackwell Science [for] Ecological Society of Australia
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Science [for] Ecological Society of Australia
– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References Goldingay R. L., Grimson M. J. and Smith G. C. (2007) Do feathertail gliders show a preference for nest box design? Wildlife Research 34, 484-490.
Law B. S. and Chidel M. (2006) Eucalypt plantings on farms: Use by insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 133, 236-249.
Lewis T., Taylor D., Swift S. and Debuse V. (2012) Factors influencing early restoration progress of a Eucalyptus tereticornis open forest on former agricultural land. Pacific Conservation Biology 18, 263-281.
Bowen M. E., McAlpine C. A., House A. P. N. and Smith G. C. (2007) Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: A review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna. Biological Conservation 140, 273-296.
Lindenmayer D. B., Welsh A., Donnelly C. et al. (2009) Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition. Biological Conservation 142, 33-42.
Smith G. C. and Agnew G. (2002) The value of 'bat boxes' for attracting hollow-dependent fauna to farm forestry plantations in southeast Queensland. Ecological Management and Restoration 3, 37-46.
Van Dyck S., Gynther I. and Baker A. (2013) Field Companion to the Mammals of Australia. New Holland Publishers, Sydney.
Eyre T. J., Kelly A. L., Neldner V. J. et al. (2011) BioCondition: A Condition Assessment Framework for Terrestrial Biodiversity in Queensland. Assessment Manual. Version 2.1. Queensland Herbarium, DSITIA, Brisbane, Qld.
Rueegger N. N., Goldingay R. L. and Brookes L. O. (2012) Does nest box design influence use by the eastern pygmy possum? Australian Journal of Zoology 60, 372-380.
Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. (1981) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
2012; 60
2002; 3
2012; 18
1981
2009; 142
2013
2007; 140
2011
2007; 34
2006; 133
e_1_2_6_9_1
Sokal R. R. (e_1_2_6_10_1) 1981
Van Dyck S. (e_1_2_6_11_1) 2013
e_1_2_6_8_1
e_1_2_6_5_1
Eyre T. J. (e_1_2_6_3_1) 2011
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_7_1
e_1_2_6_6_1
e_1_2_6_2_1
References_xml – year: 2011
– volume: 60
  start-page: 372
  year: 2012
  end-page: 380
  article-title: Does nest box design influence use by the eastern pygmy possum?
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Zoology
– volume: 133
  start-page: 236
  year: 2006
  end-page: 249
  article-title: Eucalypt plantings on farms: Use by insectivorous bats in south‐eastern Australia
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– year: 1981
– volume: 18
  start-page: 263
  year: 2012
  end-page: 281
  article-title: Factors influencing early restoration progress of a open forest on former agricultural land
  publication-title: Pacific Conservation Biology
– volume: 3
  start-page: 37
  year: 2002
  end-page: 46
  article-title: The value of ‘bat boxes’ for attracting hollow‐dependent fauna to farm forestry plantations in southeast Queensland
  publication-title: Ecological Management and Restoration
– volume: 140
  start-page: 273
  year: 2007
  end-page: 296
  article-title: Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: A review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 34
  start-page: 484
  year: 2007
  end-page: 490
  article-title: Do feathertail gliders show a preference for nest box design?
  publication-title: Wildlife Research
– volume: 142
  start-page: 33
  year: 2009
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow‐dependent animals? Long‐term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– year: 2013
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.016
– volume-title: BioCondition: A Condition Assessment Framework for Terrestrial Biodiversity in Queensland. Assessment Manual
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Eyre T. J.
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.1071/PC120263
– volume-title: Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
  year: 1981
  ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Sokal R. R.
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.012
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.026
– volume-title: Field Companion to the Mammals of Australia
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Van Dyck S.
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  doi: 10.1071/WR06174
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  doi: 10.1071/ZO12117
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1442-8903.2002.00088.x
SSID ssj0017369
Score 2.0667813
Snippet Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)...
Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)...
Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red‐gum ( Eucalyptus tereticornis )...
Summary Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red-gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)...
Nest boxes were deployed in planted and regrowth areas in association with a revegetation project to restore Forest Red-gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
istex
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 153
SubjectTerms agricultural land
Animal behavior
artificial hollows
birds
breeding
Ecosystems
Eucalyptus tereticornis
fauna
forests
habitats
land restoration
nest boxes
offsets
planting
Reforestation
regrowth
reptiles
surveys
terrestrial vertebrate
Trees
Title Nest boxes in planted and regrowth Forest Red‐gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.) ecosystems
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-DVH0D4ZW-8/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Femr.12156
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1681240329
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1751205737
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NatwwEB6aQKGX_pe4SYtaSkkPLrYlW156Cl2ne-lSsk1TSkFIlrwJyXqX9RqSWx-hz9gnyYy8a5JDodCbjSVsz2g030iabwDemDxNSxmnoR1YGwots3BQRSYk3hjn0CPGmtZ0RxM5_p4PC6LJ-bDJhen4IfoFN7IMP1-TgWvT3DByN1t6agSi28Yowadv8C_9DoLkvpwdxguIIPF-zSpEp3j6nrd80Val54hQSbiXt-DmTdDqvc7hg__63odwfw022UE3Oh7BHVc_hruFJ6q-egI_x_hmZuaXrmFnNVtckJQt07VlSzfF-Hx1yqh0JzY6cvbPr9_Tdsb2C-KuvVqs2oahTigHklK7GjaZvX_HMJjtuKGbp3B8WHz9OArX1RbCEjFSFhqeahMlVsYuN0QBI7UTsuKi0sK4SAhUqklMHuUu4zypyhhdmUC8lUW25FXEn8F2Pa_dDrAq5qlJrZMJLwUVLhRVokU5iIXWwmoewOuN3NWiI9VQm2AExaS8mALYQY0oPcXJTh1PElqaiTAezVIRwFuvpr6zXp7TATWZqpPxJzX8NoqG4seJygPY2-hRrW2zUTFRromIJ4MAXvWP0apoq0TXbt5iG4lAiLgiZQD7Xqt__1BVfD7yF8__veku3KMf6k5O7sH2atm6F7DV2PalH8bXhODwrQ
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,1408,27935,27936,46066,46490
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fi9QwEB_cE9EX_8tVT40icj5U2iZtWvBF3J4r3i1ye-eJCCFt0lV0u8t2C3dvfgQ_o5_EmXS33D0Igm8tTWg7k8n8ZpL8BuBZkcZxKcPYN5kxvtAy8bMqKHzijbEWPWKoKac7msjxp3SYE03Oq81ZmI4fok-4kWW4-ZoMnBLS56zczpaOGyEZwGWRiIwKN3D-oV9DkNwVtMOIATEk3q95hWgfT9_1gjcaVHqOGJXEe3oBcJ6Hrc7v7N34vy--CdfXeJO97gbILbhk69twJXdc1Wd34MsYX82K-alt2LeaLX6QoA3TtWFLO8UQffWVUfVObHRoze-fv6btjO3mRF97tli1DUO10DFIOt3VsMns5QuG8WxHD93cheO9_OjNyF8XXPBLhEmJX_BYF0FkZGjTglhgpLZCVlxUWhQ2EAL1WkRFGqQ24TyqyhC9mUDIlQSm5FXA78FWPa_tNrAq5HERGysjXgqqXSiqSIsyC4XWwmjuwdON4NWi49VQm3gExaScmDzYRpUoPcX5Th1PIsrOBBiSJrHw4LnTU99ZL7_THjUZq5PxWzX8OAqG4vOJSj3Y2ShSrc2zUSGxromAR5kHT_rHaFi0WqJrO2-xjUQsRHSR0oNdp9a_f6jKDw7dxf1_b_oYro6ODvbV_rvx-wdwjX6u20i5A1urZWsfwqAx7SM3pv8AsE30zg
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fi9QwEB_cE8UX_8tVT40icj5U2iZtuvgkbtcVdTluPU9ECEmTrqLbXba7cPfmR_Az-kmcSXfL3YMg-NbShLYzmcxvksxvAJ6YPE1LGaeh7VsbCi2zsF9FJiTeGOfQI8aa1nRHEzn-lA8Kosl5sc2FafkhugU3sgw_X5OBL2x1xsjdbOmpEbIeXBQEwyl_gx90WwiS-3p2GDAghMT7Da0QHePpup5zRr1KzxGiknRPzuHNs6jVu53htf_64OtwdYM22ct2eNyAC66-CZcKz1R9egu-jPHNzMxPXMO-1Wzxg8Rsma4tW7opBuirr4xqd2KjQ2d___w1Xc_YfkHktaeL1bphqBRKgqTcroZNZs-fMYxmW3Lo5jYcDYsPr0bhptxCWCJIykLDU22ixMrY5YY4YKR2QlZcVFoYFwmBWjWJyaPcZZwnVRmjLxMIuLLIlryK-B3Yqee12wVWxTw1qXUy4aWgyoWiSrQo-7HQWljNA3i8lbtatKwaahuNoJiUF1MAu6gRpac426mjSUJrMxEGpFkqAnjq1dR11svvdEJNpup4_FoNPo6igfh8rPIA9rZ6VBvjbFRMnGsi4kk_gEfdYzQr2ivRtZuvsY1EJERkkTKAfa_Vv3-oKt4f-ou7_970IVw-GAzVuzfjt_fgCv1be4pyD3ZWy7W7D73Grh_4Ef0H0jDzfQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nest+boxes+in+planted+and+regrowth+Forest+Red%E2%80%90gum+%28Eucalyptus+tereticornis+Sm.%29+ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Ecological+management+%26+restoration&rft.au=Smith%2C+Geoffrey+C.&rft.au=Hogan%2C+Luke+D.&rft.au=Franks%2C+Alan&rft.au=Franks%2C+Stacey&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.issn=1442-7001&rft.eissn=1442-8903&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Femr.12156&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Femr.12156&rft.externalDocID=EMR12156
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1442-7001&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1442-7001&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1442-7001&client=summon