Improvement in Outpatient Follow-up With a Postdischarge Phone Call Intervention

• Published in: Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Vol. 28; no. 18; pp. e815 - e822
• Main Authors: Hendrickson, Sarah B., Simske, Natasha M., DaSilva, Katia A., Vallier, Heather A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 15-09-2020; by American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aftercare - methods; Aged; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Patient Compliance; Patient Discharge; Prospective Studies; Psychosocial Support Systems; Treatment Outcome; Wounds and Injuries - psychology; Wounds and Injuries - surgery; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1067-151X; 1940-5480
• DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00132

INTRODUCTION:Attending clinic appointments after injury is crucial for orthopaedic trauma patients to evaluate healing and to update recommendations. However, attendance at these appointments is inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a personalized phone call placed 3 to 5 days after hospital discharge on attendance at the first postdischarge outpatient clinic visit.
METHODS:This prospective study was done at an urban level 1 trauma center. One hundred fifty-nine patients were exposed to a reminder phone call, with 33% of patients being reached for a conversation and 28% receiving a voicemail reminder. Phone calls were made by a trained trauma recovery coach, and the main outcome measure was attendance at the first postdischarge clinic visit.
RESULTS:Eighty-six patients (54%) attended their scheduled appointments. Appointment adherence was more common among the group reached for a conversation (70% versus 51% for voicemail cohort and 34% for no contact group). Patients exposed to the Trauma Recovery Services (TRS) during their hospital stay attended appointments more often (91% versus 61%, P = 0.026). Age, sex, mechanism of injury, and distance from the hospital were not associated with specific follow-up appointment adherence. Insured status was associated with higher attendance rates (71% versus 46%, P = 0.0036). Other economic factors such as employment were also indicative of attendance (64% versus 48%, P = 0.05). Current tobacco use was associated with poor appointment attendance (30%) versus 56% for nonsmokers (P = 0.001).
DISCUSSION:Patients reached by telephone after discharge had better rates of subsequent clinic attendance. Economic factors and substance use appear vital to postoperative clinic visit compliance. Patients with met psychosocial needs, as identified by individuals with satisfactory emotional support, and exposure to TRS had the highest rates of postdischarge appointment attendance.