Two-scale micropolar plate model for web-core sandwich panels
•2-D micropolar plate model is developed for 3-D web-core sandwich panels.•The micropolar formulation is built upon on two-scale constitutive modeling.•A classical 3-D unit cell represents the microscale and the 2-D plate the macroscale.•Navier solution is derived for the novel 2-D micropolar plate...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of solids and structures Vol. 170; pp. 82 - 94 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Elsevier Ltd
01-10-2019
Elsevier BV |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •2-D micropolar plate model is developed for 3-D web-core sandwich panels.•The micropolar formulation is built upon on two-scale constitutive modeling.•A classical 3-D unit cell represents the microscale and the 2-D plate the macroscale.•Navier solution is derived for the novel 2-D micropolar plate model.•Problems unsolvable by classical plates are solved by the micropolar one.
A 2-D micropolar equivalent single-layer (ESL), first-order shear deformation (FSDT) plate model for 3-D web-core sandwich panels is developed. First, a 3-D web-core unit cell is modeled by classical shell finite elements. A discrete-to-continuum transformation is applied to the microscale unit cell and its strain and kinetic energy densities are expressed in terms of the macroscale 2-D plate kinematics. The hyperelastic constitutive relations and the equations of motion (via Hamilton’s principle) for the plate are derived by assuming energy equivalence between the 3-D unit cell and the 2-D plate. The Navier solution is developed for the 2-D micropolar ESL-FSDT plate model to study the bending, buckling, and free vibration of simply-supported web-core sandwich panels. In a line load bending problem, a 2-D classical ESL-FSDT plate model yields displacement errors of 34–175% for face sheet thicknesses of 2–10 mm compared to a 3-D FE solution, whereas the 2-D micropolar model gives only small errors of 2.7–3.4% as it can emulate the 3-D deformations better through non-classical antisymmetric shear behavior and local bending and twisting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7683 1879-2146 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.04.026 |